Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barnett and Anne Berch Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$217kEducation$99kArts & Culture$25kFood & Nutrition$25kEnvironment$19kPhilanthropy$9kSocial Science$8kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA$15,000
ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK$10,000
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH$5,000
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND$5,000
FRIENDS OF FRANKLIN INC$5,000
KENYA CONNECT$3,000
WEDU PBS$2,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$2,000
HARVARD COLLEGE FUND$1,000
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL FUND$1,000
MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
CA
MD
TN
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$390k · 19 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$390k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+71%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $85k · revenue +49%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +12%
  • ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • V(
    VIM (VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE)
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • HC
    HARVARD CLUB OF SARASOTA SCHOOL PRINCIPALS' FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • CC
    CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
7
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Conservation Law Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $85,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CEN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $35,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERIC…Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $24,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood of Northern New Engl…MILLS COLLEGE FUND: $43,000 · OtherMILLS COLLEGE FUNDPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYC: $23,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYCNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCT…HARVARD COLLEGE FUND: $10,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE FUNDTANGLEWOOD ANNUAL FUND: $9,000 · OtherTANGLEWOOD ANNUAL FUNDHARVARD LAW SCHOOL FUND: $8,000 · OtherHARVARD LAW SCHOOL FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+4 more: $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VE…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $14,000 · EducationMassachusetts In…FRIENDS OF FRANKLIN: $11,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF FRANK…MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $9,000 · EducationMEHARRY MEDICAL …BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $6,000 · EducationBARRINGTON STAGE…ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $13,300 · Arts & CultureSarasota Opera Association Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 · Environment
Health$144,000Other$120,000Education$60,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Civil Rights$25,000Arts & Culture$19,300Environment$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $85,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $24,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $13,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FRANKLIN: $11,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSarasota Opera Association Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENYA CONNECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FRANKLIN ↗
  • Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds Sarasota Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds KENYA CONNECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barnett and Anne Berch Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barnett and Anne Berch Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Capstone Community Action Inc: 84% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Barnett and Anne Berch Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Barnett and Anne Berch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barnett and Anne Berch’s filings →

More from the funding graph