Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bard-Steel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$608k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$501k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

82% of Bard-Steel Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Bryan Area Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’23
2
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Philanthropy$659kYouth Development$110kCommunity Improvement$110kRecreation & Sports$50kArts & Culture$10kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $501k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYAN AREA FOUNDATION$501,000
WILLIAMS COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH$15,000
UNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTY$12,000
BRYAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS NORTH CENTRALGEORG: $50k → 11%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA BLACK SWAMP: $5k → 9%BRYAN AREA FOUNDATION: $501k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH: $15k → 11%BRYAN AREA FOUNDATION: $111k → 12%WILLIAMS COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY: $50k → 12%WILLIAMS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDAT: $50k → 12%BRYAN OHIO ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $50k → 12%LIFEWISE ACADEMY: $20k → 12%LIFEWISE ACADEMY: $20k → 12%UNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTY: $12k → 12%UNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTY: $12k → 12%UNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTY: $12k → 12%BRYAN AREA FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%BRYAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%WCCT: $10k → 12%WESLEY UNITED MEHTODIST CHUIRCH: $3k → 12%WILLIAMS COUNTY YMCA: $20k → 12%WILLIAMS COUNTY YMCA: $20k → 12%WILLIAMS COUNTY YMCA: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$131k · 3 repeat orgs$243k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$131k
$168k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k
  • LI
    LIFEWISE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +184%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $36k · revenue -25%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUBS NORTH CENTRALGEORG
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • WC
    WILLIAMS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • BO
    BRYAN OHIO ATHLETIC BOOSTERS
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRYAN AREA FOUNDATION INC: $623,000 · PhilanthropyBRYAN AREA FOUNDATION INCUNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTY: $36,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS GIRLS CLUBS NORTH CENTRALGEORG: $50,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBS NORTH CENTRALGE…WILLIAMS COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY: $50,000 · OtherWILLIAMS COUNTY PORT AUTHORITYWILLIAMS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDAT: $50,000 · OtherWILLIAMS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT FOUN…BRYAN OHIO ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $50,000 · OtherBRYAN OHIO ATHLETIC BOOSTERSBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH: $15,000 · OtherWCCT: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $7,500 · OtherLIFEWISE INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRYAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$659,000Other$287,500Youth Development$40,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRYAN AREA FOUNDATION INC: $623,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetLIFEWISE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTY: $36,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRYAN AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WILLIAMS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BRYAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bard-Steel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bard-Steel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bard-Steel Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bard-Steel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bard-Steel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph