Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Barbara Lubin Goldsmith Foundation Co Roger Goldman

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2017
16
Grants FY2017
6
States reached
$887k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

89% of Barbara Lubin Goldsmith Foundation Co Roger Goldman’s FY2017 grant dollars went to Jewish Communal Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What you fund
01FY2017 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k13 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
  • $250k+1 grant · $887k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$886,800
WILLIAMS COLLEGE$64,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY$20,000
UC REGENTS$5,000
JVS$5,000
ASPEN EDUCATION FUND$5,000
PUBLIC THEATER$2,500
NEW YORK CITY CENTER$2,500
JAZZ ASPEN SNOWMASS$2,120
LARK$2,000
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$1,500
A SENSE OF HOME$1,000
FIRE ISLAND ARTIST RESIDENCY$1,000
SUMMIT 54$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A SENSE OF HOME: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
2
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York City Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $886,800 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDWilliams College — $64,000 · EducationWilliams …THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $20,000 · EducationTHE ADMIN…+1 more — $1,000 · EducationUC REGENTS — $5,000 · OtherASPEN EDUCATION FUND — $5,000 · OtherJVS — $5,000 · OtherLARK — $2,000 · Other+2 more — $1,000 · OtherNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $2,500 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY CENTER INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS — $2,120 · Arts & CultureFIRE ISLAND ARTIST RESIDENCY INCORPORATED — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $1,500 · HealthA SENSE OF HOME — $1,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$886,800Education$85,000Other$18,000Arts & Culture$8,120Health$1,500Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $886,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWilliams College — $64,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS — $2,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA SENSE OF HOME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT54 — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRE ISLAND ARTIST RESIDENCY INCORPORATED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFORMAN SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Barbara Lubin Goldsmith Foundation Co Roger Goldman funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Barbara Lubin Goldsmith Foundation Co Roger Goldman?

Find your warmest path to Barbara Lubin Goldsmith Foundation Co Roger Goldman through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph