Loading…
· Public charity
Banner Health Foundation
Banner Health Foundation (bhf) secures and stewards charitable contributions to advance banner health's (bh) mission.
$33M
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
1
Communities
$20M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$130MEducation$301kHuman Services$257kOther$8k
02FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
- $250k+3 grants · $24M
$1,978,142
Median grant
1
States reached
$187M
Total assets
Largest grants
- BANNER HEALTH$20,004,056
- Banner Medical Group$2,015,031
- Banner University Medical Group$1,978,142
- Wyoming Medical Center$98,847
- University of Arizona Foundation$91,382
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $257k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$131M · 6 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
2
Total granted
$131M
$103k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+46%
+98%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBanner Health8× · 2017–2024 · $106M · revenue +68%
- BMBanner Medical Group8× · 2017–2024 · $16M · revenue +46%
- BUBanner University Medical Group8× · 2017–2024 · $8.0M · revenue +38%
Funded once
- AAARIZONA ASTHMA COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $95k · revenue +98%
- ACAMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACYone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Tucson Medical Center
Tucson medical center's mission is to deliver caring, personalized, quality healthcare to patients and their families in an environment that is supportive, education-focused and compassionate.
Health
2
Texas Health Physicians Group
A FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATION WHOSE MISSION IS TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF the people in the communities it serves, regarless of thier ability to pay.
Health
3
Unmc Physicians
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.
Health
4
Scott & White Clinic
Faith based physician group providing exemplary patient care, medical education, medical research and community service to residents of the Central Texas region since 1904.
Health
5
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation
Improving health, healing people.
Health
6
Yuma Regional Medical Center
Through prudent use of resources, our 406-bed inpatient hospital, along with numerous outpatient clinics, serves as the healthcare hub for all of yuma county.
Health
7
Baylor University Medical Center
Faith based acute care hospital providing exemplary patient care, medical education, medical research and community service to residents of the Dallas/Fort Worth twelve county region since 1903.
Health
8
Renown Health
To establish, equip and maintain one or more general acute care hospitals and medical centers.
Health
9
Pinnacle Health Medical Services
Pinnacle health medical services provides primary care, clinic and specialty physician services.
Health
10
Baptist Health Medical Group Inc
To provide healthcare services and facilities that benefit the communities we serve.
Health
11
Baptist Health Medical Group Inc
As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist health medical group inc is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist…
Health
12
Arkansas Health Group
The primary function and activity of arkansas health group is to provide healthcare services to patients in rural and urban communities throughout arkansas.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Banner Medical Group Colorado and the most unlike its peers is Wyoming Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$130,166,219Education$301,016Human Services$256,635Other$7,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Banner Health ↗
- Who funds Banner Medical Group ↗
- Who funds Banner University Medical Group ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds SUN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Medical Center ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA ASTHMA COALITION ↗
- Who funds BANNER MEDICAL GROUP COLORADO ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Banner Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SUN HEALTH FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +61% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 860483792 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SUN HEALTH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Banner Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Banner Health Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines