Skip to content

· Private foundation

Baltimores Promise Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$641k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$1.2MEmployment$337kYouth Development$200kHuman Services$164k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $620k
$115,427
Median grant
2
States reached
$409k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Baltimores Promise II$200,000
The Urban Alliance$171,385
Bon Secours Community Works$115,427
Civic Works$67,114
Maryland New Directions$66,527
Community College of Baltimore County$20,369
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Bon Secours Community Works: $115k → 19%Bon Secours Community Works: $48k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$541k · 4 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$541k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+32%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $267k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthEmploymentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $191k · revenue +0%
  • BS
    Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $164k · revenue +44%
  • CW
    CIVIC WORKS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $106k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $1,050,000 · EducationFUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INCCIVIC WORKS INC: $106,189 · EducationCIVIC WORKS INCBALTIMORES PROMISE II: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentBALTIMORES P…THE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $191,395 · EmploymentTHE URBAN A…Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc: $163,791 · Human ServicesBon Secou…Community College of Baltimore County: $79,325 · OtherMARYLAND NEW DIRECTIONS INC: $66,527 · Health
Education$1,156,189Youth Development$200,000Employment$191,395Human Services$163,791Other$79,325Health$66,527

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC: $1,050,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBALTIMORES PROMISE II: $200,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $191,395 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc: $163,791 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCIVIC WORKS INC: $106,189 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMARYLAND NEW DIRECTIONS INC: $66,527 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baltimores Promise Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baltimores Promise Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Civic Works Inc: 63% of income from government
  • Maryland New Directions Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Fund for Educational Excellence Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Baltimores Promise’s filings →

More from the funding graph