Skip to content

· Private foundation

Austin J M Cotr U Art 5a Ow

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$227kHuman Services$224kAnimals$149kArts & Culture$83kEducation$37kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$4,611
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETYRISE 4 ANIMALS$13,826
KLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM SVCS$11,062
CT CHILDRENS' MEDICAL CENTER (CCMC)$9,220
HARTFORD HOSPITAL$9,220
BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES FOR YOUTH$6,455
GAYLORD HOSPITAL$4,611
THE SALVATION ARMY INC$4,611
MILAN HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC$4,611
FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOUSE$4,611
THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$4,611
AMERICAN SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF$4,611
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$4,611
CT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND (CIB)$4,611
HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$2,767
CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY$2,767
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES: $8k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES FOR YOUTH: $7k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES: $7k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES FOR YOUTH: $6k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES: $6k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES: $6k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES: $6k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES: $6k → 11%BERKSHIRE FARM CTR & SERVICES: $5k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD: $3k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD: $3k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD: $3k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD: $3k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD: $2k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD: $2k → 11%HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$828k · 20 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
0

Total granted

$828k
$0

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +53%
  • HH
    Hartford Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +112%
  • TF
    TOGETHER FOR YOUTH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +89%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

    The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

    Health
    2
    The Hospital of Central Connecticut

    The Hospital of Central Connecticut is dedicated to fostering, sustaining and improving the health status of the people in the communities we serve.

    Health
    3
    Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut Inc

    Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…

    —
    4
    Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Inc

    The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group is to put patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, and exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

    Health
    5
    Hartford Healthcare Senior Services Inc

    To provide and promote wellness and independence to ensure optimal quality of life for the people we serve.

    Health
    6
    The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital

    To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

    Health
    7
    Hartford HealthCare at Home Inc

    The mission of the agency is to provide and safeguard quality home health care to all persons in need, especially the indigent and medically underserved population. The agency strongly believes that appropriate health care is a fundamental…

    Health
    8
    The William W Backus Hospital

    To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

    Health
    9
    Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

    The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

    —
    10
    Hartford HealthCare Corporation

    Hartford HealthCare's mission is to improve the health and healing of the people and communities it serves.

    Health
    11
    Midstate Medical Center

    The mission of Midstate Medical Center is to improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

    Health
    12
    Natchaug Hospital Inc

    The mission of Natchaug Hospital is to provide a continuum of accessible, community-based services for those living with psychiatric illness and chemical dependency or emotional and related educational disabilities, with a commitment to…

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Klingberg Comprehensive Program Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    9/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    KLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM SERVICES INC: $99,390 · OtherKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM SERVICES INCSOC NE ANTI-VIVISECTION: $84,079 · OtherSOC NE ANTI-VIVISECTIONIndividual grant recipient: $67,760 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY: $41,425 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETYRISE 4 ANIMALS: $40,157 · OtherANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETYRISE 4 ANIMALSIndividual grant recipient: $31,614 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONNECTICUT INST FOR THE BLIND: $21,951 · OtherCT CHILDRENS' MEDICAL CENTER (CCMC): $19,613 · Other+3 more: $29,279 · Other+3 moreHartford Hospital: $82,836 · HealthHartford HospitalAmerican Heart Association Inc: $41,425 · HealthAmerican Heart Associa…Gaylord Hospital INC: $41,425 · HealthGaylord Hospital INCMILAN HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC: $41,425 · Arts & CultureMILAN HISTO…THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $41,425 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDRE…TOGETHER FOR YOUTH: $57,990 · Human ServicesTOGETHER FO…HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS: $24,854 · Human ServicesHARTFORD NE…AMERICAN SCHOOL AT HARTFORD FOR THE DEAF: $36,881 · EducationCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $24,854 · Animals
    Other$435,268Health$165,686Arts & Culture$82,850Human Services$82,844Education$36,881Animals$24,854

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM SERVICES INC: $99,390 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHartford Hospital: $82,836 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER FOR YOUTH: $57,990 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMILAN HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC: $41,425 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $41,425 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $41,425 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGaylord Hospital INC: $41,425 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SCHOOL AT HARTFORD FOR THE DEAF: $36,881 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $24,854 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS: $24,854 over 9y, 0.8% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds KLINGBERG COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds Hartford Hospital ↗
    • Who funds TOGETHER FOR YOUTH ↗
    • Who funds MILAN HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC ↗
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
    • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
    • Who funds Gaylord Hospital INC ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN SCHOOL AT HARTFORD FOR THE DEAF ↗
    • Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds HARTFORD NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Austin J M Cotr U Art 5a Ow funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Austin J M Cotr U Art 5a Ow. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
    • American School at Hartford for the Deaf: 32% of income from government
    • Gaylord Hospital Inc: 6% of income from government
    • Klingberg Comprehensive Program Services Inc: 2% of income from government
    • Hartford Hospital: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Austin J M Cotr U Art 5a Ow’s filings →

    More from the funding graph