Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Astor Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Astor Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Federation Of San Francisco The Peninsula Marin & Sonoma, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Astor Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $28k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
20
5
21
0
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202022.

Philanthropy$542kInternational$10kEducation$4kHuman Services$2kCrime & Legal$2kReligion$1kOther$35k
02FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k12 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISRAEL TENNIS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO$10,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PALO ALTO$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY$1,800
JEWISH CHAPLAINCY$1,800
BRADLEY SONNENBERG FOUNDATION$1,500
ADVOT PROJECT$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
OUR HOUSE$1,000
AKIM-JERUSALEM FOUNDATION$1,000
CLUB Z$1,000
JEWISH COALITION FOR LITERACY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 87% of Astor Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 93% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Astor Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13k · 4 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +247% since the first grant, against +122% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$13k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+247%
+122%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
ReligionInternationalEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PALO ALTO
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k
  • AJ
    AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue -5%
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k

Funded once

  • IT
    ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +80%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • PE
    PEF ENDOWMENT GOLDSTEIN VILLAGE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
3
University of Judaism Foundation
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Sherit Isroel
6
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
7
The Jerusalem Connection
8
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
9
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
10
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
12
Youth Towns of Israel (California)
International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Rimon Club Z Dba Club Z. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $541,691 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMAISRAEL TENNIS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO — $10,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PALO ALTO — $5,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherOUR HOUSE — $2,000 · OtherJEWISH CHAPLAINCY — $1,800 · OtherPEF ENDOWMENT GOLDSTEIN VILLAGE — $1,500 · OtherBRADLEY SONNENBERG FOUNDATION — $1,500 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $1,400 · Other+5 more — $3,800 · OtherISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $3,800 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $2,000 · Human ServicesADVOT — $1,800 · Crime & LegalRimon Club Z DBA Club Z — $1,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$541,691Other$35,400International$10,000Education$3,800Human Services$2,000Crime & Legal$1,800Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $541,691 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $3,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOT — $1,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRimon Club Z DBA Club Z — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Astor Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph