Skip to content
Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health Inc

Strengthening and promoting the education, research, service, and practice activities of ceph-accredited schools and programs and advocating for the investment in science needed to advance population health and for evidence-based public health policies and programs.

$4.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$7.7MCommunity Improvement$2.5MHealth$2.0MEducation$1.2M
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $2,530,310, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,246,838 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,716,528 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $812k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.7M
$126,240
Median grant
9
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL BOARD OF PUBLIC HEALTH EXAMINERS$1,380,656
NATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS$280,304
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$187,906
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$184,824
UNT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$137,776
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY$126,240
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$89,967
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA$85,432
UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH$27,653
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY & CITY HEALTH OFFICIALS (NACCHO)$13,612
CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY$8,951
TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$6,989
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%University of Arizona: $612k → 15%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $241k → 8%Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health: $999k → 16%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $188k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $69k → 11%DREXEL UNIVERISTY: $10k → 22%UCLA: $680k → 14%University at Albany: $446k → 14%UNT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $138k → 11%TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $23k → 16%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center: $247k → 16%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY & CITY HEALTH OFFICIALS (NACCHO): $14k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $85k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $28k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $185k → 8%Emory University: $4.5M → 14%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $90k → 18%University of Washington: $738k → 9%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $126k → 6%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $95k → 15%University of Pittsburgh: $223k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $394k → 14%TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $7k → 16%NATIONAL BOARD OF PUBLIC HEALTH EXAMINERS: $1.4M → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $384k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $11k → 9%CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%NATIONAL BOARD OF PUBLIC HEALTH EXAMINERS: $1.1M → 14%CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%NATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS: $280k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 8 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$10M
$713k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4.9M · revenue +80%
  • NB
    National Board of Public Health Examiners
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2.5M · revenue 0% · 55% of their budget
  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.1M

Funded once

  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New Yorkgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $446k · revenue +62%
  • UO
    University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
    one grant, 2017 · $247k
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
6
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is National Board of Public Health Examiners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Emory University: $4,904,466 · EducationEmory UniversityPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,239,772 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $445,809 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New Yo…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $292,305 · Education+3 more: $49,353 · EducationREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $1,073,879 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $749,858 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $707,502 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center: $247,195 · OtherUniversity of Oklahoma Health S…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $187,906 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $184,824 · OtherUNT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $137,776 · OtherGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $126,240 · Other+5 more: $256,563 · Other+5 moreNational Board of Public Health Examiners: $2,454,386 · Community ImprovementNational Board of Pu…NATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS: $280,304 · Health
Education$6,931,705Other$3,671,743Community Improvement$2,454,386Health$280,304

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmory University: $4,904,466 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNational Board of Public Health Examiners: $2,454,386 over 2y, 55% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,239,772 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $445,809 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $292,305 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS: $280,304 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetClaremont Graduate University: $28,925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS: $13,612 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $10,428 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds National Board of Public Health Examiners ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS ↗
  • Who funds Claremont Graduate University ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

American Heart Associ…
American Heart Association IncTX13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home