Skip to content

· Private foundation

Association of Community Action Par

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$452k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Public Safety & Disaster$354kEmployment$86kHuman Services$46kCommunity Improvement$4kPublic Benefit$3kHousing & Shelter$2kInternational$2k
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $366k
$52,950
Median grant
1
States reached
$116k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALCASIEU PARISH POLICE JURY HUMAN$149,300
ASSIST AGENCY$84,700
LASALLE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY IN$79,400
OUACHITA MULTI-PURPOSE CAP INC$52,950
BEAUREGARD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$46,600
CAMERON COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$37,050
VERNON COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL$1,050
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Vernon Community Action Council: $3k → 18%Quad Area Community Action Agency: $3k → 20%VERNON COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 5 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$185k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+43%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21
Human ServicesEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ASSIST AGENCY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $86k · revenue -39%
  • OM
    OUACHITA MULTI-PURPOSE CAP INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $55k
  • CC
    CAMERON COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $38k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • EC
    Evangeline Community Action Agency
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • PB
    Pine Belt Multi-Purpose Agency
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SJ
    St James Parish Dept of HR
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Agency of South Alabama Inc

Administration of federal, state and local awards and grants for the poverty sector of a 7 county area in alabama, providing headstart education, food, shelter, maintenance, and weatherization programs.

—
2
Community Action Commission of Belmont County

Community assistance

Human Services
3
Community Action Agency Inc

To aid low income families with early education, energy assistance, nutrition help and other services.

Human Services
4
Community Action Agency of Northeast Alabama Inc

To assist individuals at or below the poverty line by providing resources, funding, and education.

Human Services
5
Community Action Commission of Fayette County

Administers grants and contracts to help the lives of those individuals who fall below the poverty level.

—
6
Csra Economic Opportunity Authority

Community action agency established to promote self-sufficiency among individuals, children, and families with low income by providing self-help opportunities through housing, employment, and other supporting services.

—
7
Community Action Agency of Northwest Alabama Inc

Our mission is to reduce the causes and adverse consequences of poverty and to empower low-income individuals, families and communities to achieve self-sufficiency through advocacy, resource utilization and service delivery.

—
8
Cayugaseneca Community Action Agency Inc

To respectfully assist people to achieve and sustain self-sufficiency through direct services, education, and community partnerships. the agency administers more than 50 different programs including head start, early head start, homeless…

—
9
Community Action Agency of Talladega Clay Randolph Calhoun & Cleburne Count

The community action agency of talladega, clay, randolph, calhoun, and cleburne counties is committed to reducing and/or eliminating the causes and consequences of poverty for families and communities through comprehensive educational and…

Community Improvement
10
Community Action Partnership of Middle Alabama Inc

Providing low income individuals home energy assistance and providing emergency assitance as needed

—
11
Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation

Alleviating the causes and conditions of poverty in a ten county area of Southwest Missouri.

Human Services
12
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quad Area Community Action Agency Inc; the most unlike its peers is Florida Association for Community a. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALCASIEU PARISH POLICE JURY HUMAN: $149,300 · OtherCALCASIEU PARISH POLICE JURY HUMANLASALLE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY IN: $79,400 · OtherLASALLE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INOUACHITA MULTI-PURPOSE CAP INC: $55,450 · OtherOUACHITA MULTI-PURPOSE CAP INCBEAUREGARD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $46,600 · OtherBEAUREGARD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYCAMERON COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $38,050 · OtherCAMERON COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC+17 more: $34,101 · Other+17 moreTHE ASSIST AGENCY INC: $85,926 · EmploymentTHE ASSIST AGENCY I…VERNON COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $3,550 · Human ServicesQUAD AREA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesFlorida Association for Community A: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$402,901Employment$85,926Human Services$6,050Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ASSIST AGENCY INC: $85,926 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetCAMERON COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $38,050 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetVERNON COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $3,550 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMACON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetQUAD AREA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,342 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLASALLE COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Association for Community A: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ASSIST AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMERON COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds VERNON COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MACON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds QUAD AREA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LASALLE COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cenla Community Action Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds Florida Association for Community A ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of Community Action Par funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of Community Action Par. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Association of Community Action Par’s filings →

    More from the funding graph