Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Wisconsin · Public charity

Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc

We heal people, promote health and strengthen communities.

$34k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$12k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$11,700
Largest grant, FY2024
$11,700
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$144M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$26kFood & Nutrition$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
School District of Tomah$18,7002n/a
Rhinelander Area Food Pantry Inc$10,00010%
Lincoln County Government$7,0001n/a

Compare Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc with peer funders

About Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc

How much does Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc give?
Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc reported 1 itemized grants totaling $11,700, out of $33,704 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (72%), Food & Nutrition (28%).
Who are Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: School District of Tomah ($19k), Rhinelander Area Food Pantry Inc ($10k), Lincoln County Government ($7k).
Where is Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc based?
Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics Inc is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $41k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aspirus Rhinelander & Tomahawk Hospitals & Clinics’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home