Skip to content

· Private foundation

Asm Family Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MPhilanthropy$302kHealth$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kCommunity Improvement$6kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$1kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,180
Median grant
1
States reached
$349k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION YETEV LEV DSATMAR$6,000
KOL YEHUDA INC$2,390
MISCCHARITIES UNDER 1000$2,180
THE OJC FUND$2,000
TALMUD TORAH OF KASHO$2,000
KOLEL SHARY LIMUD$1,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$834k · 33 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
59

Total granted

$834k
$327k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+109%

Still filing today

6%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyInternationalReligionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    CONGREGATION YETEV LEV DSATMAR OF
    6× · 2018–2023 · $157k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH HILLEL
    2× · 2020–2022 · $156k
  • CY
    CONGREGATION YETEV LEV SHUL INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $101k

Funded once

  • YO
    YESHIVA OHR TORAH
    one grant, 2022 · $98k
  • CY
    CONGREGATION YESHIVA TZROR HACHAIM
    one grant, 2019 · $41k
  • BY
    BEER YITZCHOK AD
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
3
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
4
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
5
Kollel Bais Yosef Inc

To expend, contribute, and otherwise dispose of its money, and other property to further jewish religious scholarship by contributing to or otherwise voluntarily financially assisting needy religious institutions, or students, both in the…

Religion
6
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
7
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
Keren Imrei Yosef Ohr Shalom

To make grants to religious and charitable organizations.

Religion
10
Chevra-Kadisha Yerushalayim Inc

To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…

Philanthropy
11
Keren Hayeshivot Fund Inc

Keren hayeshivot fund supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
12
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Dmir Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bayis Lepleitos - Ateres Bonos Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION YETEV LEV DSATMAR OF: $156,955 · OtherCONGREGATION YETEV LEV DSATMAR OFCONGREGATION BETH HILLEL: $156,100 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH HILLELCONGREGATION YETEV LEV SHUL INC: $101,404 · OtherCONGREGATION YETEV LEV SHUL INCYESHIVA OHR TORAH: $98,376 · OtherYESHIVA OHR TORAHCONGREGATION YESODAH KOL YEHUDA: $86,972 · OtherCONGREGATION YESODAH KOL YEHUDAMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES UNDER 1000: $67,908 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES UNDER 1000CONGREGATION YESHIVA TZROR HACHAIM: $40,510 · Other+81 more: $435,443 · Other+81 moreTHE OJC FUND: $232,159 · EducationTHE OJC FUNDMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $8,656 · ReligionREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $5,750 · HealthRENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyKOL YEHUDA INC: $2,390 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $2,300 · InternationalBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC: $1,200 · International
Other$1,143,668Education$232,159Religion$8,656Health$5,750Human Services$5,000Philanthropy$4,890International$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OJC FUND: $232,159 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $8,656 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $5,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOL YEHUDA INC: $2,390 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG MIKVA YISRAEL OF W P B: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI ↗
  • Who funds REFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY73.6× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Hf Foundation · I&S Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · R' Shaya Ben Moshe Foundation · Cornerstone Foundation The · Jl Charitable Foundation · Blum Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Asm Family Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asm Family Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Asm Family Charitable Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Asm Family Charitable Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Asm Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph