How much did ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED grant in FY2024?

ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED reported 47 grants totaling $6,115,496 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED based?

ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED is based in CA.

ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED

Our mission is to disrupt gender-based violence, which causes physical, sexual, emotional, spiritual, and economic harm within AAPI communities throughout the U.S.

$6.1M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$507k

Largest

01What you fund

0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$2.8MCrime & Legal$1.2MHealth$1.0MArts & Culture$527kCivil Rights$496kInternational$333kPublic Benefit$197kCommunity Improvement$191kPhilanthropy$183kOther$1.2M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2022

—

2023

culturaldomesticwomenhealthadvocacysurvivorsabuse

2024

healthstatesculturaldomesticadvocacyislanderabuse

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$50k–250k42 grants · $5.3M
$250k+2 grants · $795k

$128,348

Median grant

States reached

$6.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

GUAM COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL$506,520
MONSOON ASIANS & PACIFIC ISLA$288,568
ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES$236,754
TOHGE CORPORATION$164,028
KILUSAN WELLNESS$159,993
FRACTURED ALTAS$159,656
CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS$155,249
ASIAN AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE$152,826
MEI FONG & ASSOCIATES DBA ASI$152,114
AAPCHO$145,670
API CHAYA$145,146
RAKSHA INC$144,737
SIKH FAMILY CENTER$143,594
GUMA MAMI INC$143,467
RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY INSTITU$141,537

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.7M · 42 repeat orgs$532k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +147% since the first grant, against +92% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.7M

$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+147%

+92%

Still filing today

90%

83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $324k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GC
GUAM COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL
2× · 2023–2024 · $627k · revenue +203% · 28% of their budget
N
NAPIESV
2× · 2023–2024 · $602k · revenue +1984%
AA
ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES
2× · 2023–2024 · $245k · revenue +412%

Funded once

VI
Vera Institute of Justicegraduated
one grant, 2022 · $85k · revenue +92%
AC
ACTIVATING CHANGEgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $63k · revenue +53%
Mujeres Unidas Y Activasgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +131%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Asian Pacific Institute On Gender-Based

Our mission is to disrupt gender-based violence, which causes physical, sexual, emotional, spiritual, and economic harm within AAPI communities throughout the U.S. and its territories.

Arts & Culture

Hmong American Womens Association Inc

To organize Southeast Asian women, girls, Queer and Trans people to champion gender justice and collective liberation.

Human Services

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services

Asian American Advocacy Alliance

Community Improvement

Alliance for Asian American Justice Inc

Coordinate pro bono legal assistance for victims of anti-Asian violence

Civil Rights

Asian Americans Advancing Justice -

The mission of AAAJ-ALC is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian Pacific Islander (API) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist in the United…

Crime & Legal

Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc

CAAAV was founded in 1986 as one of the first groups in the United States to respond to racially motivated violence against Asians. Since then, CAAAV has broaden its focus to address a wide array of needs and challenges facing the Asian…

Civil Rights

Aapi Equity Alliance

Aapi equity alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations that advocates for the rights and needs of the asian and pacific islander (api) community in the greater los angeles area, with particular focus on low-income, immigrant,…

Human Services

Asian Task Force Against Domestic

Atask empowers asian survivors of domestic violence and abuse to rebuild their lives. our work bridges language and cultural gaps for asian communities and advocates for social change.

Crime & Legal

Advocates for Immigrant Survivors

AIS's mission is to provide immigration legal services and social services to aid survivors in accessing the rights to justice, dignity, and restoration. AIS's main programs are our Immigration Legal Services Program, our Case Management…

Human Services

Vietnamese American Roundtable

The Vietnamese American Roundtable (VAR) envisions a strong and unified Vietnamese American community that works towards improving our quality of life. To this end, VAR focuses our mission to organize, advocate, and educate our community.…

Community Improvement

Women Speaking Out

Prevention of domestic violence in women and women empowerment in the state of hawaii.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monsoon Asians & Pacific Islanders in and the most unlike its peers is Research & Advocacy Institute Gilgit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/52

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,513

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

46/46

Grantees still filing

39/46

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$2,833,204Crime & Legal$1,220,491Health$1,021,376Other$1,756,995Arts & Culture$527,439Civil Rights$496,453International$332,849

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GofundmeorgCA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gofundmeorg · Women's Foundation of California · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Asian Americans Advancing Justice · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Tides Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn · Novo Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: KILUSAN WELLNESS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 830806239 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on KILUSAN WELLNESS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 84% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based?

Find your warmest path to Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based?

More from the funding graph

ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2026.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based?

More from the funding graph