Skip to content
Ashley Lions Club at a glance

· Public charity

Ashley Lions Club

ASHLEY LIONS CLUB is organized for civic service and through charitable gaming attempts to raise funds to expend for charitable purposes.

$245k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$129kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kArts & Culture$59kPublic Benefit$53kHealth$36kEmployment$25kHuman Services$21kMembership Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $216,165, the rows itemized in this filing. The $245,050 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,885 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $104k
$25,910
Median grant
1
States reached
$892k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF ASHLEY$52,850
MCINTOSH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$51,300
ASHLEY COMMUNITY RODEO CLUB$37,600
ASHLEY MEDICAL CENTER$25,910
ASHLEY COUNTRY CLUB$17,550
ASHLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT$14,000
ASHLEY SENIOR CENTER$9,000
ASHLEY AMBULANCE SERVICE$7,955
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CITY OF ASHLEY: $53k → 15%MCINTOSH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $51k → 15%ASHLEY COMMUNITY RODEO CLUB: $38k → 15%ASHLEY COUNTRY CLUB: $30k → 15%ASHLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $28k → 15%ASHLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $26k → 15%ASHLEY JOB DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $25k → 15%ASHLEY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $25k → 15%ASHLEY PARK BOARD: $25k → 15%ASHLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 15%ASHLEY COUNTRY CLUB: $18k → 15%ASHLEY AMERICAN LEGION: $15k → 15%ASHLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $14k → 15%ASHLEY SENIOR CENTER: $12k → 15%MCINTOSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMEN: $11k → 15%ASHLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%ASHLEY COUNTRY CLUB: $10k → 15%ASHLEY PUBLIC SCHOOL: $9k → 15%ASHLEY SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 15%ASHLEY COMMUNITY RODEO CLUB: $9k → 15%ASHLEY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $8k → 15%MCINTOSH COUNTY 4H: $8k → 15%ASHLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 7 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$279k
$74k

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ASHLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $67k
  • AC
    ASHLEY COUNTRY CLUB
    3× · 2022–2024 · $58k · revenue +46% · 27% of their budget
  • AC
    ASHLEY COMMUNITY RODEO CLUB
    2× · 2022–2024 · $46k

Funded once

  • AJ
    ASHLEY JDA
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AP
    ASHLEY PARK BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AA
    ASHLEY AMERICAN LEGION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASHLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $67,200 · OtherASHLEY FIRE DEPARTMENTASHLEY COUNTRY CLUB: $57,550 · OtherASHLEY COUNTRY CLUBCITY OF ASHLEY: $52,850 · OtherCITY OF ASHLEYASHLEY COMMUNITY RODEO CLUB: $46,100 · OtherASHLEY COMMUNITY RODEO CLUBASHLEY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $32,955 · OtherASHLEY AMBULANCE SERVICEASHLEY JDA: $25,000 · OtherASHLEY JDAASHLEY PARK BOARD: $25,000 · OtherASHLEY PARK BOARDASHLEY SENIOR CITIZENS: $20,500 · OtherASHLEY SENIOR CITIZENSMCINTOSH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMEN: $18,989 · OtherASHLEY AMERICAN LEGION: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $9,475 · OtherMCINTOSH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $51,300 · Arts & CultureMCINTOSH COU…Ashley Medical Center: $35,910 · Health
Other$370,619Arts & Culture$51,300Health$35,910

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASHLEY COUNTRY CLUB: $57,550 over 3y, 27% of budgetMCINTOSH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $51,300 over 1y, 59% of budgetAshley Medical Center: $35,910 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASHLEY COUNTRY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MCINTOSH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Ashley Medical Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

North Dakota Communit…
North Dakota Community FoundationND19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Dakota Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ashley Lions Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashley Lions Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ashley Lions Club?

    Find your warmest path to Ashley Lions Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $384k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ashley Lions Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home