· Public charity
Ashgro Inc
Ashgro's mission is to safeguard humanity by minimizing the risk of misalignment in artificial intelligence.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INC | $30,000 |
| BERKELEY EXISTENTIAL RISK INITIATIVE | $10,320 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 26% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Grants abroad, by region: $30k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GRANT TO GRADIENT INSTITUTE
Stated purpose: GRANT TO EA POLAND FOR INJECT RESEARCH
How this is measured
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ashgro Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashgro Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Ashgro’s filings →