Loading…
· Public charity
ASG Brooklyn Center
Provided an educational facility for Odyssey Academy and then Noble Academy after Odyssey Academy was closed.
$560k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants
2
Communities
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- $10k–50k6 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Modern Montessori Charter School$250,000
- Chad Greenway Lead the Way Foundation$100,000
- Childrens Cancer Research Foundation$50,000
- University of Minnesota Foundation$40,000
- Fraser$30,000
- United Negro College Fund MinneapolisTwin Cities$25,000
- Pinky Swear Foundation$25,000
- Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery$20,000
- Marsha Leigh Foundation$20,000
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Children's Physicians
Children's physicians is the leading pediatric primary care practice dedicated to caring for all children in omaha and the surrounding areas, while supporting education and research.
Health
2
Children's Hospital of Michigan
To support pediatric research, education, community benefit programs, and other (see sch o) initiatives to improve the health of children in michigan.
Health
3
Minneapolis College of Art and Design
Embolden creative leaders to transform society through equity, empathy, & imagination.
Education
4
Children's Medical Center Foundation
Children's medical center foundation pursues and secures philanthropic contributions to enable children's health system of texas and its related entities to fulfill the mission of making life better for children.
Health
5
University of Minnesota Foundation
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
Education
6
Children's National Medical Center
Coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o
Health
7
Children's Cancer Family Foundation of
Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.
Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Health
9
The Children's Mercy Hospital Foundation
To provide support for the activities and mission of The Children's Mercy Hospital.
Health
10
Great Mn Schools
Makes strategic investments in proven and promising schools, providing the expert guidance, funding resources to create a community of great schools.
Education
11
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
Health
12
Minnesouri Scholarship Foundation
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Children's Cancer Research Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$315,000Youth Development$100,000Human Services$75,000Philanthropy$70,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Modern Montessori Charter School ↗
- Who funds Chad Greenway Lead the Way Foundation ↗
- Who funds Childrens Cancer Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds University of Minnesota Foundation ↗
- Who funds Fraser ↗
- Who funds Pinky Swear Foundation ↗
- Who funds United Negro College Fund MinneapolisTwin Cities ↗
- Who funds Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery ↗
- Who funds Marsha Leigh Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ASG Brooklyn Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Chad Greenway Lead the Way Foundation.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 261782419 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Chad Greenway Lead the Way Foundation, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to ASG Brooklyn Center?
Find your warmest path to ASG Brooklyn Center through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines