Skip to content

· Public charity

Arts & Business Council of Greater Boston Inc

To provide direct legal/business services, educational programs, and affordable arts spaces for artists and arts/cultural organizations.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.1MScience & Tech$854kPhilanthropy$197kYouth Development$185kHousing & Shelter$100kPublic Benefit$95kCommunity Improvement$65kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $290,949, the rows itemized in this filing. The $311,030 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,081 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
$14,036
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STIGGITY STACKZ WORLDWIDE INC$109,850
Individual grant recipient$60,008
ROXBURY DISTRICT INCREMENT FINANCING PROJECT$21,850
Individual grant recipient$17,759
REFUGE LOWELL$16,846
Individual grant recipient$14,036
ART IN THE PARK$13,066
ARTEVERYWHERE$10,989
WESTERN AVENUE COMMUNITY FOR THE ARTS INC$10,000
#ARTSTAYSHERE COALITION$8,593
BATTLE OF THE BIOTECH BANDS$7,952
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $407k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NEW ENGLAND MUSICIANS RELIEF FUND: $398k → 8%NEW ENGLAND MUSICIANS RELIEF FUND: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 16 repeat orgs$520k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$2.3M
$424k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+39%

Still filing today

31%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BATTLE OF THE BIOTECH BANDS
    5× · 2018–2023 · $832k
  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND MUSICIANS RESOURCE FUND INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $407k · revenue -42%
  • AI
    ART IN THE PARK
    7× · 2017–2025 · $187k

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RECORD COMPANY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +39%
  • RD
    ROXBURY DISTRIC INCREMENT FINANCING PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $43k
  • AC
    AREA CODE ART FAIR
    one grant, 2021 · $31k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BATTLE OF THE BIOTECH BANDS: $831,787 · OtherBATTLE OF THE BIOTECH BANDSART IN THE PARK: $187,318 · OtherART IN THE PARKSTIGGITY STACKZ WORLDWIDE INC: $184,901 · OtherSTIGGITY STACKZ WORLDWIDE INCREFUGE LOWELL: $99,615 · OtherHUB AND SPOKE: $95,003 · Other+20 more: $517,125 · Other+20 moreNEW ENGLAND MUSICIANS RESOURCE FUND INC: $407,177 · Human ServicesNEW ENGLAND MUSI…THE RECORD COMPANY INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RECORD CO…WESTERN AVENUE COMMUNITY FOR THE ARTS INC: $67,000 · Arts & CultureWESTERN AVENU…DUNAMIS INC: $51,062 · Arts & CultureDUNAMIS INCBRAIN ARTS ORGANIZATION INC: $20,225 · Arts & CultureBRAIN ARTS OR…+1 more: $11,396 · Arts & CultureBOBB FOUNDATION: $159,392 · Philanthropy
Other$1,915,749Human Services$407,177Arts & Culture$349,683Philanthropy$159,392

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ENGLAND MUSICIANS RESOURCE FUND INC: $407,177 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetTHE RECORD COMPANY INC: $200,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBOBB FOUNDATION: $159,392 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetWESTERN AVENUE COMMUNITY FOR THE ARTS INC: $67,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetDUNAMIS INC: $51,062 over 2y, 39% of budgetBRAIN ARTS ORGANIZATION INC: $20,225 over 2y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND MUSICIANS RESOURCE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RECORD COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOBB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN AVENUE COMMUNITY FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUNAMIS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN ARTS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKANDA PROJECT ORGANIZATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arts & Business Council of Greater Boston Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arts & Business Council of Greater Boston Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Western Avenue Community for the Arts Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Makanda Project Organization Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Record Company Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Dunamis Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arts & Business Council of Greater Boston’s filings →

More from the funding graph