Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arminius Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$207kCivil Rights$83kCommunity Improvement$37kHealth$14kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHAKER SCHOOLS FDN$30,125
CLEVELAND NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS$25,000
IN MOTION$13,630
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$13,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $10k → 12%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $27k → 17%SHAKER SCHOOLS FDN: $45k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $5k → 12%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $20k → 17%SHAKER SCHOOLS FDN: $36k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $5k → 12%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $15k → 17%SHAKER SCHOOLS FDN: $30k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $5k → 12%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $13k → 17%SHAKER SCHOOLS FDN: $15k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $8k → 17%SHAKER SCHOOLS FDN: $13k → 17%SHAKER HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10k → 17%SHAKER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2k → 17%FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $1k → 17%CLEVELAND NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS: $25k → 17%CLEVELAND MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL: $10k → 17%CLEVELAND NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS: $750 → 17%EFFECTIVE LEARNING ACADEMY: $3k → 17%IN MOTION: $14k → 17%SHAKER HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $1k → 17%FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH: $25k → 17%SHAKER WEB DESIGN ENTREPRENEUR PROG: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$284k · 5 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$284k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-10%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHAKER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $139k · revenue +86%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $83k · revenue +68%
  • NP
    NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • CM
    CLEVELAND MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SW
    SHAKER WEB DESIGN ENTREPRENEUR PROG
    one grant, 2023 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
2
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
3
New Heights Academy Charter School

New heights is a product of and exists to serve the students of washington heights, inwood, and harlem. we opened in 2006 as the very first charter school in our district. our school was founded by a team of local educators who came…

Education
4
Ronald C Wornick Jewish Day School

Ronald c. wornick jewish day school develops students who are socially and academically prepared to meet their full potential as engaged leaders committed to a life steeped in jewish ethics and values.

5
Westchester Secondary Charter School

Westchester secondary charter school will provide students in grades 6-12 with a challenging and comprehensive college preparatory education in a public school setting employing the technology of the 21st century. we will inspire students…

6
Charles E Smith Jewish Day School of Greater Washington Inc

Cesjds is a pre k-12 grade independent day school that delivers an exemplary general and jewish education. our purpose is to ensure a vibrant jewish future by fostering the growth of confident, compassionate thinkers who engage the world…

Education
7
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

8
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
9
Benjamin Franklin Charter School - Queen Creek

The mission of benjamin franklin charter school is to offer a well-rounded education with proven superior academics, exceptional programs, time-honored values, and a high level of parental participation.

Education
10
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

11
Chatham County Economic Development Corporation

Building on the county's strategic location between the triad and triangle, edc is positioning chatham as the preferred location for emerging growth companies. the policy-driven approach focuses on targeted attraction, retention, and…

Community Improvement
12
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shaker Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Breakthrough Schools. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHAKER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $139,032 · OtherSHAKER SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONCLEVELAND MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherCLEVELAND MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL+3 more — $7,650 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $83,400 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEWilliams College — $25,000 · EducationWilliams CollegeFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS — $25,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF BREAK…NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $25,750 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD…SHAKER HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $11,000 · Community ImprovementSHAKER HEIGH…INMOTION — $13,630 · HealthSHAKER HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$156,682Civil Rights$83,400Education$50,000Community Improvement$36,750Health$13,630Arts & Culture$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHAKER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $139,032 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $83,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $25,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWilliams College — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINMOTION — $13,630 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHAKER HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $11,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSHAKER HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Cleveland FoundationOH13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arminius Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arminius Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Arminius Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph