· Public charity
Arizona Veterans Research and Education Foundation
To promote, support, and facilitate meritorious biomedical and health services research and education activities conducted by investigators at the phoenix va health care system that contribute to improve healthcare for veterans and the general public.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES | $24,971 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA | $6,606 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA4× · 2018–2022 · $420k
- ASARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY6× · 2018–2025 · $81k
- DHDIGNITY HEALTH-ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AZ2× · 2018–2020 · $57k
Funded once
- PPREVENTAGEone grant, 2020 · $130k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGEone grant, 2020 · $26k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Mayo Clinic Group Return
How this is measured
Play a game based on Arizona Veterans Research and Education’s filings →