· Public charity
Area Agency on Aging of Western Arkansas
To provide comprehensive and coordinated programs for the elderly in counties of arkansas and oklahoma.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN ARKANSAS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $2,752,743 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,571,824 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $819,081 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k5 grants · $845k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEBASTIAN RETIRED CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC | $980,200 |
| CRAWFORD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC | $658,724 |
| FRANKLIN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER INC | $269,006 |
| MENAPOLK COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC | $234,021 |
| SCOTT COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC | $215,995 |
| PARIS LOGAN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER | $143,193 |
| BOONEVILLE LOGAN CO SENIOR CITIZENS | $134,604 |
| COSSATOT POLK COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INCORPORATED | $117,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SRSEBASTIAN RETIRED CITIZENS ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $6.6M · revenue +14% · 56% of their budget
- CCCRAWFORD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +20% · 75% of their budget
- MCMENAPOLK COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +3% · 81% of their budget
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To offer a nutrition program for older persons.
Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.
Meals for elderly
Providing meals to the senior citizens at the meal site and with home deliveries.
To promote and organize nutritional services, quality care giving, social and educational activities for shelby county senior citizens and create public awareness about senior citizens issues and concerns.
The organization operates a senior center, providing social services, meals, and activities to the senior residents of hockley county.
Providing low-cost meals for the elderly in the surrounding area.
Senior Center facility for the local Meals on Wheels production.
Provide facilities for congregate and home delivered meals
Provides meals and services to senior citizens of the comunity and surrounding towns
We prepare meals for senior citizens and provide a place for recreational activities and fellowship. meals are served in our building or are delivered to home-bound individuals.
Provide an accessible venue for senior citizens to socialize.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franklin County Senior Citizens Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cossatot Polk County Senior Citizens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEBASTIAN RETIRED CITIZENS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds MENAPOLK COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTT COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds COSSATOT POLK COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds PARIS LOGAN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BOONEVILLE LOGAN CO SENIOR CITIZENS ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Area Agency on Aging of Western Arkansas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.