· Public charity
Arab Gulf Programme for Development
Organization's mission the ARAB GULF PROGRAMME FOR DEVELOPMENT's (agfund) mission establishes that, through the implementation of its programs, it will provide support to needy groups to help facilitate their full access to basic and undamental social requirements, such as education and health care, under the umbrella of fair national…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $2,600,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,445,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,845,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k3 grants · $550k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME | $1,400,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO | $650,000 |
| HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL | $200,000 |
| EDUCATION FOR EMPLOYMENT | $200,000 |
| UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND (UNICEF) | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $6.8M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: PROG.SUPPORT
Stated purpose: PROG.SUPPORT
Stated purpose: PROG.SUPPORT
Stated purpose: PROG.SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $650k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +46%- HKHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL3× · 2019–2024 · $450k · revenue +36%
- IMINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS2× · 2020–2022 · $250k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- OOOFFICE OF THE UN-SECRETARY-GENERALone grant, 2021 · $1.0M
- TWThe World Bankone grant, 2023 · $400k
- UNUNITED NATIONS CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUNDone grant, 2020 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…
The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.
Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.
Eastwest institute (ewi) works to reduce international conflict, addressing seemingly intractable problems that threaten world security and stability. (continued on schedule o)
Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…
Village empowerment inc. (hereinafter referred to as 've') is a non-profit organization incorporated on 4th january, 2007. it is registered under section 501(c)(3) of the u.s. internal revenue code. ve is an organization dedicated to bring…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Near East Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Education for Employment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOR EMPLOYMENT ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds NEAR EAST FOUNDATION ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arab Gulf Programme for Development funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.