Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Apa Services Inc

To promote the mutual professional, scientific and training interests of psychologists including advancing psychology's roles and interests in understanding behavior and advancing health, science, education and human welfare.

$410k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
28
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$1.9MCrime & Legal$53kRecreation & Sports$14kCommunity Improvement$9k
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 28 grants below total $389,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $410,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $346k
$14,000
Median grant
28
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARKANSAS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$25,000
MISSISSIPPI PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$22,000
LOUISIANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$21,500
MISSOURI PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$21,250
NEVADA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$19,500
NEW HAMPSHIRE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$19,000
OKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$18,500
WYOMING PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$17,750
MONTANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$16,000
ALASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$15,500
RHODE ISLAND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$15,000
IOWA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$15,000
NEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$14,500
WEST VIRGINIA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$14,000
DELAWARE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC$13,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DELAWARE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $13k → 10%Nebraska Psychological Assoc: $23k → 13%IDAHO PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $19k → 8%MONTANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $16k → 9%OKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $23k → 13%South Carolina Psychological Assoc: $13k → 16%ARKANSAS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $25k → 17%Iowa Psychological Assoc: $19k → 9%ALABAMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $13k → 18%WISCONSIN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $15k → 17%Connecticut Psychological Assoc: $15k → 12%RHODE ISLAND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $15k → 7%WYOMING PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $18k → 11%NEVADA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $20k → 10%LOUISIANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $22k → 19%NEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $23k → 13%Idaho Psychological Assoc: $13k → 8%MONTANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $16k → 9%OKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $23k → 13%SOUTH CAROLINA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $13k → 16%ARKANSAS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $23k → 17%IOWA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $15k → 9%ALABAMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $12k → 18%WISCONSIN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $14k → 17%Rhode Island Psychological Assoc: $15k → 7%Nevada Psychological Assoc: $17k → 10%Louisiana Psychological Assoc: $12k → 19%Nebraska Psychological Assoc: $20k → 13%IDAHO PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $13k → 8%MONTANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $14k → 9%Oklahoma Psychological Assoc: $19k → 13%Arkansas Psychological Assoc: $14k → 17%NEVADA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $15k → 10%LOUISIANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $12k → 19%NEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $15k → 13%IDAHO PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $13k → 8%MONTANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $14k → 9%OKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $19k → 13%ARKANSAS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $14k → 17%Nevada Psychological Assoc: $14k → 10%NEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $15k → 13%IDAHO PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $13k → 8%OKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $19k → 13%ARKANSAS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $14k → 17%NEVADA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $14k → 10%NEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $13k → 13%Oklahoma Psychological Assoc: $13k → 13%NEVADA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
NV
WY
SD
IA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
NE
MO
WV
DE
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 32 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
4

Total granted

$2.0M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+7%

Still filing today

81%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    New Hampshire Psychological Association
    6× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue +28%
  • OP
    OKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $115k · revenue +15%
  • NP
    NEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $107k · revenue +3% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • ND
    North Dakota Psychological Association
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • PP
    PENNSYLVANIA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +19%
  • AP
    ARIZONA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Psychological Assn for Psychoanalysis Inc

Advancement of psychoanalysis both as a branch of knowledge and as clinical practice

Health
2
Nebraska Psychiatric Society

Promote the advancement of science & progress of psychiatry

—
3
American Psychopathological Association

The american psychopathological association is devoted to the scientific investigation of disordered human behavior, and its biological and psychosocial substrates. it's primary function is to sponsor an annual conference on a specific…

—
4
Idaho Society of Individual Psychol

Further the concepts of individual psychology

Education
5
Society for Psychophysiological Research Inc

The purpose of the society for psychophysiological research is to foster research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of behavior.

Social Science
6
North Carolina Psychiatric Association

To promote the science, art and practice of psychiatry and to maintain high professional standards in this field in the state of North Carolina.

—
7
Wisconsin Psychiatric Association Incorporated

The wisconsin psychiatric association is a professional organization representing physician members to specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental illnesses, including substance use disorders.

—
8
Montana Psychiatric Association

To promote the common professional interests of its members, to improve the treatment, rehabilitation and care of persons with mental disorders, to advance the standards of all psychiatric services and facilities, to promote research,…

—
9
Michigan Psychological Association Foundation

Promote public mental health welfare and to advance the science and profession of psychology for charitable, educational and scientific purposes.

Health
10
American Psychological Association

American psychological association is a national membership organization created to promote the advancement, communication, and application of psychological science and knowledge to benefit society and improve lives. apa fulfills these…

Social Science
11
Maryland Psychological Association Foundation

All activities serve to educate practitioners with the ultimate goal of raising standards of mental health care and promoting the study of animal and human behavior to better serve the public need.

Health
12
American Psychiatric Association

The american psychiatric association (apa) was incorporated in 2000 as a 501(c)(6) trade association. its 38,000 u.s. and international physician members specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health and disorders, including…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Psychological Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Hampshire Psychological Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr13%60%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%65%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
17/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

New Hampshire Psychological Association — $125,000 · OtherNew Hampshire Psychological AssociationOKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $114,500 · OtherOKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONNEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $107,000 · OtherNEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONARKANSAS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $100,500 · OtherMISSOURI PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $97,250 · OtherMISSISSIPPI PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $95,000 · OtherALASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $91,000 · OtherIDAHO PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $79,500 · OtherMAINE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $75,500 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSN — $75,000 · OtherIOWA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $74,000 · OtherMONTANA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $71,000 · OtherLouisiana Psychological Association Inc — $68,000 · Other+22 more — $748,250 · Other+22 moreNEVADA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $92,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,921,500Recreation & Sports$92,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew Hampshire Psychological Association — $125,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetOKLAHOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $114,500 over 6y, 23% of budgetNEBRASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $107,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetARKANSAS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $100,500 over 6y, 40% of budgetMISSOURI PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $97,250 over 6y, 27% of budgetMISSISSIPPI PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $95,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetNEVADA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $92,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetALASKA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $91,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetIDAHO PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $79,500 over 6y, 27% of budgetMAINE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $75,500 over 6y, 20% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSN — $75,000 over 6y, 37% of budgetIOWA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $74,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetLouisiana Psychological Association Inc — $68,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetVERMONT PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $62,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetRHODE ISLAND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $59,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $54,500 over 5y, 35% of budgetWISCONSIN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $46,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetMINNESOTA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $42,500 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetHAWAII PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $38,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $38,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetDELAWARE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $37,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCONNECTICUT PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $32,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetNEW YORK STATE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $24,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $18,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTENNESSEE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC INC — $15,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetFLORIDA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetARIZONA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNEW JERSEY PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $5,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Apa Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Delaware Psychological Association Inc — 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Apa Services Inc?

Find your warmest path to Apa Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines