Skip to content
Anne and Natalio Fridman Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Anne and Natalio Fridman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$706k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$469k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.0MReligion$1.7MEducation$159kArts & Culture$37kHealth$37kInternational$30kHuman Services$21kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k38 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
  • $250k+1 grant · $469k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN$468,589
ARIEL AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIDRASHA$102,000
RAMAZ SCHOOL$21,440
JEWISH CENTER OF ATLANTIC BEACH$21,146
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$15,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$15,000
AISH HATORAH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL$4,071
AMIT CHILDREN INC$3,355
UNITED HATZALAH$3,000
FIFTH AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,915
HAPPYPURIMCOM$1,880
RISING HEROES INC$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISASKIM: $360 → 20%MISASKIM CORP: $300 → 20%MISASKIM CORP: $200 → 20%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $350 → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $300 → 17%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $360 → 17%MET COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $360 → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $1k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $150 → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NV
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 53 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
53

Total granted

$2.1M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+23%

Still filing today

55%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationInternationalReligionPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $69k · revenue +22%
  • AC
    AMIT CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $18k · revenue +119%
  • UE
    Upper East Side Hatzolah Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $14k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • OV
    ORAH V SIMCHA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
7
The Jerusalem Connection
—
8
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
10
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
12
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hadassah Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is West Side Kollel Torah Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/57
Grantees still filing
34/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARIEL AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIDRASHA: $782,000 · OtherARIEL AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIDRASHACONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN: $644,217 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUNRAMAZ SCHOOL: $142,971 · OtherRAMAZ SCHOOL+80 more: $413,049 · Other+80 moreJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $1,900,360 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $68,690 · Philanthropy+5 more: $2,111 · PhilanthropyTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $15,000 · HealthUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $14,400 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $5,755 · Health+9 more: $2,786 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $25,100 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $360 · Arts & CultureAMIT CHILDREN INC: $18,360 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $4,300 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $2,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC: $1,800 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $1,102 · International+4 more: $2,610 · InternationalYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $7,300 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $6,000 · EducationYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $3,171 · EducationSHEFA SCHOOL: $2,500 · EducationTHE TIKVAH FUND: $1,580 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Education+3 more: $1,727 · EducationThe Chaya-Israel Foundation Inc: $6,500 · ReligionWEST SIDE KOLLEL TORAH CENTER: $5,000 · ReligionPURIM PROJECT INC: $3,595 · ReligionNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $3,250 · ReligionRISING HEROES INC: $1,800 · Religion+1 more: $500 · Religion
Other$1,982,237Philanthropy$1,971,161Health$37,941Arts & Culture$33,460International$30,172Education$23,278Religion$20,645

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $1,900,360 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $68,690 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $25,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $18,360 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $14,400 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $7,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chaya-Israel Foundation Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $5,755 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE KOLLEL TORAH CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $4,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $3,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $3,171 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $3,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2,780 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI SPECIAL NEEDS INSTITUTE INC: $2,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHEFA SCHOOL: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISING HEROES INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND: $1,580 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCSC REPERTORY LTD D/B/A CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY: $1,140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $1,102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR THE RESOLUTION OF AGUNOT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $860 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMACULAR DEGENERATION FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN OR INC: $710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANIELLA MOFFSON FOUNDATION INC: $526 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $512 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $452 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetECHO NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH: $430 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC: $371 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALAN T BROWN FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FACIAL PAIN ASSOCIATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Upper East Side Hatzolah Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Chaya-Israel Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE KOLLEL TORAH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds PURIM PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT MAHARAT INC ↗
  • Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
  • Who funds MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Foun…The Ephraim and Gail …Morris & Anna Propp S…Jewish Federation of …The Goldberg Family C…Richard Hirsch Founda…Swieca Children Found…Nash Family FoundationThe Ojc FundJesselson FoundationShaykin Family Founda…
Jewish Communal FundNY38.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · The Ephraim and Gail Propp Family Foundation Inc · Morris & Anna Propp Sons Fund Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Goldberg Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Richard Hirsch Foundation · Swieca Children Foundation · Nash Family Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Jesselson Foundation · Shaykin Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anne and Natalio Fridman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anne and Natalio Fridman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 130 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anne and Natalio Fridman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home