Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anna Oschwald Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$438k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Animals$1.3MHealth$1.1MEducation$535kHuman Services$268k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$36,250
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$39,100
THE SALVATION ARMY$36,250
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$36,250
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$36,250
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$36,250
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS$36,250
RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$36,250
BIDEAWEE INC$36,250
SOC PREVENTION CRUELTY TO ANMLS$36,250
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$36,250
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$36,250
ASSOC HUMANE SOCIETY OF NJ INC$36,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $41k → 22%BIDEAWEE INC: $36k → 6%THE SALVATION ARMY: $41k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $41k → 16%BIDE A WEE INC: $41k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $41k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $41k → 12%FRIENDS OF ANIMALS: $41k → 9%RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $41k → 6%ASSOC HUMANE SOCIETY OF NJ INC: $41k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $36k → 22%BIDEAWEE INC: $35k → 6%THE SALVATION ARMY: $36k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $36k → 16%HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS: $36k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $36k → 12%FRIENDS OF ANIMALS: $36k → 9%RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $36k → 6%ASSOC HUMANE SOCIETY OF NJ INC: $36k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $35k → 22%BIDEAWEE INC: $34k → 6%THE SALVATION ARMY: $35k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $35k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $35k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $35k → 12%FRIENDS OF ANIMALS: $35k → 9%RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%ASSOC HUMANE SOCIETY OF NJ INC: $35k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $34k → 22%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $41k → 6%THE SALVATION ARMY: $34k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $34k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $34k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $34k → 12%FRIENDS OF ANIMALS: $34k → 9%RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $34k → 6%ASSOC HUMANE SOCIETY OF NJ INC: $34k → 16%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $39k → 6%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $35k → 6%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $41k → 17%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $34k → 6%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $36k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35k → 17%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $34k → 17%SOC PREVENTION CRUELTY TO ANMLS: $41k → 6%SOC PREVENTION CRUELTY TO ANMLS: $36k → 6%SOC PREVENTION CRUELTY TO ANMLS: $35k → 6%SOC PREVENTION CRUELTY TO ANMLS: $34k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$2.9M
$0

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $270k · revenue +15%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ANIMALS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $268k · revenue +51%
  • Cornell University
    8× · 2018–2025 · $268k · revenue +49%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    New York University

    Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

    Education
    2
    The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

    Animals
    3
    Humane World for Animals International

    HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

    Animals
    4
    Animal Wellness Action

    To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

    Human Services
    5
    The Animal Medical Center

    Dedicated to providing compassionate and collaborative care to animals and to leading the advancement of veterinary medicine through innovative clinical research and education.

    Animals
    6
    Drexel University

    Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

    Education
    7
    Public Responsibility in Medicine & Research Inc

    Prim&r advances the highest ethical standards in the conduct of biomedical, behavioral and social science research. prim&r accomplishes this mission through education, membership services, professional certification, public policy…

    Health
    8
    American Humane Association

    Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

    Animals
    9
    Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

    Health
    10
    Companion Animal Nutrition and Wellness Institute Inc

    To educate the pet community on nutrition and wellness for companion animals. become recognized as a credible source of independent unbiased source of nutrition and wellness information. perform unbiased independent nutrition research and…

    Animals
    11
    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

    Protection of animal rights

    Animals
    12
    Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

    We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell University and the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $270,374 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INCFRIENDS OF ANIMALS INC — $267,524 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF ANIMALS INCBIDEAWEE INC — $267,524 · AnimalsBIDEAWEE INCHumane World for Animals Inc — $267,524 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncASSOC HUMANE SOCIETY OF NJ INC — $267,524 · OtherASSOC HUMANE SOCIETY OF NJ INCTHE SALVATION ARMY — $267,524 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSOC PREVENTION CRUELTY TO ANMLS — $267,524 · OtherSOC PREVENTION CRUELTY TO ANMLSRIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $267,524 · OtherRIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONCornell University — $267,524 · EducationCornell UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $267,524 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UN…American Heart Association Inc — $267,524 · HealthAmerican Heart Ass…CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $267,524 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH IN…
    Animals$1,072,946Other$1,070,096Education$535,048Health$535,048

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $270,374 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ANIMALS INC — $267,524 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCornell University — $267,524 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $267,524 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $267,524 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC — $267,524 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $267,524 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $267,524 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
    • Who funds FRIENDS OF ANIMALS INC
    • Who funds Cornell University
    • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
    • Who funds BIDEAWEE INC
    • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
    • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Anna Oschwald Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      1get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph