· Private foundation
Angier Charitable Fund C-F David Boit Et Al Trustees
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $4k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $181k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $544k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VANGUARD CHARITABLE NO THE LEIGH KEYSER PHILLIPS CHARITABLE ACCOUNT | $181,305 |
| SCHWAB CHARITABLE NO PETER AND MARY ADAMSON CHARITABLE TRUST | $181,305 |
| VANGUARD CHARITABLE NO THE KEYSER CHARITABLE FUND | $181,305 |
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND NO WALSH GIVING FUND | $36,261 |
| AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FUND | $36,261 |
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND NO PICKLES FAMILY GIVING FUND | $36,261 |
| BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND | $36,261 |
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND NO COOKE FAMILY GIVING FUND | $36,261 |
| HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| WESTOVER SCHOOL | $1,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +141% since the first grant, against -45% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $655k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WSWESTOVER SCHOOL INC6× · 2017–2024 · $716k · revenue +43%
- HCHISTORIC COLONY HOUSE INC6× · 2018–2023 · $18k · revenue +141%
- MLMOUNTAIN LAKE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- SLSIPPICAN LANDS TRUST INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Conservation and preservation of land.
Land conservation and open space preservation
To provide the general public with woodland trails through a wildlife sanctuary in a natural state for their appreciation and enjoyment
The albany county land bank facilitates the process of acquiring, improving and redistributing vacant and abandoned properties to eliminate the harms and liabilities caused by such properties and return them to productive use, while being…
Land conservation
Conservation of land
To hold title to and manage real estate donated to or acquired by preservation trust of vermont, inc. to date, the organization is managing the historic property known as the grand isle lake house.
Winchester land trust works to preserve the rural character and natural resources of the winchester ct area and to educate the community about the benefits of land conservation and balanced growth
The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.
The organization's mission is to provide assistance to the victims of alzheimer's disease and related cognitive impairments, and their families and to raise funds for research and assistance.
Hilltown land trust conserves and stewards land through strong relationships to ensure clean water, wildlife habitat, climate resilience, recreational opportunities, and healthy farmland for the benefit of all.
The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Endowment Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Huntsman Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WESTOVER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SIPPICAN LANDS TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC COLONY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN LAKE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Angier Charitable Fund C-F David Boit Et Al Trustees funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Angier Charitable Fund C-F David Boit Et Al Trustees?
Find your warmest path to Angier Charitable Fund C-F David Boit Et Al Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.