Skip to content
Angelink Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Angelink Community Foundation

To empower individuals and families by providing support and resources to those facing financial hardships, cancer, medical crises, and emergencies- to lift up underserved communities.

$242k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$274kPhilanthropy$150kFood & Nutrition$87kArts & Culture$84kHuman Services$75kEnvironment$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kInternational$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $229,848, the rows itemized in this filing. The $242,039 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,191 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$9,506
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUSAN HAMILTON FUNDRAISER$150,000
THIRD WAVE VOLUNTEERS INC$28,407
Individual grant recipient$16,977
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC$9,506
LACES OF LOVE$9,506
PROJECT HELP NAPLES$9,506
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANC$5,946
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 75% of grant dollars ($637k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 25% that went abroad ($216k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WE CAN HELP FOUNDATION: $32k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 25% of all-years giving ($216k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Turkey$216k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Health Foundation
—
2
Global Girls Global Women Inc

A 503C3 Organization design to equip suffering girls and women around the world by helping them gain access to quality healthcare, education and economic empowerment initiatives aimed to foster self-este

Recreation & Sports
3
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
4
Global First Responders Foundation

To provide health care providers to readily search for opportunities for volunteering and providing health care abroad involving both missionary health care as well as disaster relief and to allow a template for users to blog or post their…

Health
5
Ukrainian Refugee Foundation

URF is a 501(c)(30 nonprofit based in California. We receive funds through private donations and spend them on several programs, providing aid, rescue, and relief for Ukrainian war victims in the form of cash donations for food, shelter,…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Operation Walk Florida Inc

The goal of our missions trips is to provide state of the art medical treatments to those in desperate need that otherwise have no access to treatment locally. also, exchange medical knowledge and techniques to improve the standard of care…

Human Services
7
International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Soc At the Un Inc
—
8
Kim International Medical Volunteer Foundation Inc

To provide medical vouunteers where needed

Public Safety & Disaster
9
World Aid Runners
Health
10
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
11
United Hearts for the Nations Foundation Corp
Religion
12
Global Heartcare Foundation
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All Hands and Hearts Smart Response Inc; the most unlike its peers is WeCanHelp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AHBAP ASSOCIATION: $216,336 · OtherAHBAP ASSOCIATIONSUSAN HAMILTON FUNDRAISER: $150,000 · OtherSUSAN HAMILTON FUNDRAISERCOLLIER COUNTY HUNGER & HOMEL: $43,538 · OtherCOLLIER COUNTY HUNGER & HOMELHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK: $43,538 · OtherHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANKTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $43,538 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDATHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $43,538 · OtherTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN+5 more: $52,409 · Other+5 moreFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $83,935 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF …THIRD WAVE VOLUNTEERS INC: $42,232 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $9,506 · HealthALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $43,538 · Public Safety & DisasterWeCanHelp Foundation: $31,659 · Human ServicesUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $30,219 · InternationalSMART FIT GIRLS INC: $9,815 · Youth DevelopmentLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $9,506 · Education
Other$592,897Arts & Culture$83,935Health$51,738Public Safety & Disaster$43,538Human Services$31,659International$30,219Youth Development$9,815Education$9,506

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $83,935 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $43,538 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $43,538 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHIRD WAVE VOLUNTEERS INC: $42,232 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWeCanHelp Foundation: $31,659 over 1y, 26% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $30,219 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $9,506 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $9,506 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Angelink Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Angelink Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Angelink Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Angelink Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $28k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Angelink’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home