Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Andrew M Vander Molen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$229kHuman Services$144kHealth$86kEnvironment$16kYouth Development$16kMembership Benefit$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$10,275
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$17,125
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION$13,700
FAITH REFORMED CHURCH$13,700
SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$10,275
LOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES$3,425
GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY$3,425
CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,425
MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$3,425
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 22% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 13%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL: $7k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $18k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 12%THE SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $9k → 13%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL: $6k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $17k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%THE SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $9k → 13%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL: $6k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $16k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE: $3k → 12%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $4k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $16k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $3k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $15k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE: $3k → 12%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $3k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $15k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE: $3k → 12%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL: $3k → 7%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $15k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $3k → 7%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $14k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 13%GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $3k → 7%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $14k → 10%MICHIGAN MASONIC CHARITABLE: $3k → 12%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $13k → 10%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $12k → 10%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $12k → 10%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $12k → 10%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $12k → 10%FAITH REFORMED CHURCH: $11k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY: $17k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY: $16k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$576k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$576k
$0

Still filing today

36%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $144k
  • FR
    FAITH REFORMED CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $115k
  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue -14%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    04the grantee network

    4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    4/4
    Grantees still filing
    2/4
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    SALVATION ARMY — $143,990 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFAITH REFORMED CHURCH — $115,190 · OtherFAITH REFORMED CHURCHBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION — $65,340 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient — $49,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $28,800 · OtherCORAL RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $21,815 · Other+1 more — $12,465 · OtherTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $86,395 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOS…LOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC — $19,450 · ReligionMichigan Masonic Charitable Foundation — $16,335 · Youth DevelopmentGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $16,335 · Environment
    Other$437,450Health$86,395Religion$19,450Youth Development$16,335Environment$16,335

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $86,395 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC — $19,450 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMichigan Masonic Charitable Foundation — $16,335 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $16,335 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    • Who funds LOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC
    • Who funds Michigan Masonic Charitable Foundation
    • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Andrew M Vander Molen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
    • The Shriners' Hospital for Children5% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph