Skip to content

· Public charity

Anderson Donor Advised Charitable Fund

To promote philanthropy and charitable giving across the united states for the betterment of its inhabitants, by receiving charitable contributions, by providing support and assistance to encourage charitable giving and by making grants to other public charities for charitable purposes.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$758kHousing & Shelter$630kEmployment$576kHealth$443kAnimals$161kInternational$156kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $651k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
$75,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$1,103,858
AMERICAN FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION$500,000
MONTALBANO FAMILY FOUNDATION$330,182
4HR SANCTUARY$161,457
ESSENTIAL MIND AND BODY INSTITUTE CORP$113,025
THE RAJU SANGANI FOUNDATION$100,308
BREAK BARRIERS FOUNDATION INC$100,000
VISION OF LIFE FOUNDATION$75,500
THE BEASLEY FOUNDATION NFP$50,269
BARBARA'S BLESSINGS$50,170
ELITE LIFE FOUNDATION$40,051
SUN'S SMILE SENIOR CARE$40,000
THE A-STEEM PROJECT$30,101
JOE'S HOUSE FOUNDATION$30,083
CALM AFTER THE STORM MINISTRIES$20,026
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIFE OF THE VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $90k → 11%SIGN WELL: $171k → 10%SUN'S SMILE SENIOR CARE: $40k → 9%AMERICAN FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION: $500k → 13%AMERICAN FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION: $250k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
NV
WY
CA
AR
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunshine Foundation Inc

Sunshine foundation, inc. shares sunshine inc. residential & support services' values, solicits donations supporting their mission, and serves as trusted stewards for the foundation's investments.

Human Services
2
Smiles Charity Inc

Smiles Charity is a non-profit organization dedicated to changing the world one home, one family, at a time, by providing mortgage free homes for wounded war veterans and/or first responders.

Housing & Shelter
3
Rise and Rebuild Foundation

We seek to help Filipino families escape chronic poverty through nutrition, education, jobs and the adoption of self-reliance principals. RRF and RRIF mission is to help malnourished children. We fulfill this is mission through gardens…

Human Services
4
Selectiva Charities Inc

Empower individuals and families in crisis through education, literacy, cultural preservation and essential relief efforts.

Employment
5
Sharedimpact Foundation

Providing philanthropists, foundations and family offices access to social investment expertise by allowing the donors to give tax deductible donations worldwide through a social investment market.

Philanthropy
6
Rio Grande Habitat for Humanityinc

Provide homes for low income families

—
7
Renji Ventures Inc

Provide a variety of medical, housing, and other relief to the poor.

Health
8
Affordable Housing Solutions for

Providing quality affordable housing for low and very-low income families.

—
9
Karuna Foundation

Making distributions to individuals and organizations that advocate for and/or support the wellbeing of animals, our natural environment and all global citizens, particularly by addressing humanitarian crises or deficiencies in nutrition…

Animals
10
Merciful Samaritan Inc

To send needed supplies, such as food, clothing and medical supplies to countries in need. we focus mainly on the newly formed independent states.

International
11
Stable Home Fund

To expand financial access to help underserved communities thrive.

Public Benefit
12
Namaste Foundation

To directly contribute to women's economic empowerment by providing business development training and mentoring.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund; the most unlike its peers is The Raju Sangani Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
3/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,103,858 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR…AMERICAN FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION: $750,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FINANCIAL STEW…SIGN WELL: $170,612 · Human ServicesSIGN WELLLIFE OF THE VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $90,226 · Human ServicesLIFE OF THE VILLAGE FOU…SUN'S SMILE SENIOR CARE: $40,000 · Human ServicesFIT SCHOLARS: $757,618 · Food & NutritionFIT SCHOLARSBREAK BARRIERS FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 · Housing & ShelterBREAK BARRIE…TYR DEVELOPMENT CO: $200,112 · Housing & ShelterTYR DEVELOPM…BLUE GRIT: $500,443 · EducationBLUE GRITVISION OF LIFE FOUNDATION: $75,500 · OtherVISION OF LIFE F…BEASLEY FOUNDATION NFP: $50,269 · OtherBEASLEY FOUNDATI…BARBARAS BLESSINGS INC: $50,170 · OtherBARBARAS BLESSIN…ELITE LIFE FOUNDATION: $40,051 · OtherELITE LIFE FOUND…A-STEEM PROJECT: $30,101 · OtherJOES HOUSE FOUNDATION: $30,083 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY: $25,390 · Other4HR SANCTUARY: $161,457 · Other4HR SANCTUARYESSENTIAL MIND AND BODY INSTITUTE CORP: $113,025 · OtherESSENTIAL MIND A…The Raju Sangani Foundation: $100,308 · OtherThe Raju Sangani…+2 more: $30,065 · OtherMONTALBANO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $330,182 · Recreation & Sports
Community Improvement$1,103,858Human Services$1,050,838Food & Nutrition$757,618Housing & Shelter$550,112Education$500,443Other$706,419Recreation & Sports$330,182

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,103,858 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIT SCHOLARS: $757,618 over 1y, 100% of budgetAMERICAN FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION: $750,000 over 2y, 92% of budgetBLUE GRIT: $500,443 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetBREAK BARRIERS FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetTYR DEVELOPMENT CO: $200,112 over 1y, 65% of budgetSIGN WELL: $170,612 over 1y, 85% of budget4HR SANCTUARY: $161,457 over 1y, 53% of budgetESSENTIAL MIND AND BODY INSTITUTE CORP: $113,025 over 1y, 32% of budgetThe Raju Sangani Foundation: $100,308 over 1y, 100% of budgetLIFE OF THE VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $90,226 over 1y, 93% of budgetSUN'S SMILE SENIOR CARE: $40,000 over 1y, 96% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anderson Donor Advised Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anderson Donor Advised Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anderson Donor Advised’s filings →

    More from the funding graph