Skip to content
Anderlitch Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Anderlitch Family Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
5
States reached
$800
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION$800
COVENANT HOUSE$350
OBLATE MISSIONS$300
BLESSED SACRAMENT CATHOLIC CHURCH$300
FOOD FOR THE POOR$100
SAMM MINISTRIES$100
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION$100
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$100
DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY SERVICES OF SAN ANTONIO$100
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$100
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA$53
AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA$30
AMERICAN VETERANS FOUNDATION$15
AARP FOUNDATION$15
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY SERVICES OF SAN ANTONIO: $100 → 16%PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $53 → 14%AMERICAN VETERANS FOUNDATION: $15 → 9%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $100 → 13%ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION: $800 → 16%AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $30 → 8%SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $100 → 16%BLESSED SACRAMENT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $300 → 16%OBLATE MISSIONS: $300 → 16%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $100 → 16%SAMM MINISTRIES: $100 → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aids Services of Austin Inc

Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integrated, personalized, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.

Health
2
American Academy of Physician Associates Inc

To ensure the professional growth, personal excellence, and recognition of physician associates, and to support efforts to enable them to improve the quality, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of patient-centered health care.

—
3
United States Veterans Initiative

The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
4
Vietnam Veterans of America Inc

To support a full range of issues affecting vietnam veterans, as well as, all veterans. vva is the only congressionaly chartered organization exclusively dedicated to vietnam-era veterans and their families.

Public Benefit
5
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
6
Asante

Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.

Health
7
Caritas of Austin

Caritas of austin provides a home and tailored services to prevent and end homelessness.

—
8
Disabled American Veterans of Minnesota Foundation Inc

To assist in providing for the rehabilitation and continuing welfare of america's disabled veterans, their families, dependents, and survivors.

Human Services
9
Amvets Department of California Service Foundation

Proudly serves veterans and their families in your community through service programs such as service officers, welcome home program to our homeless veterans, and grants used for various other veteran programs.

Public Benefit
10
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
11
San Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc

To develop the resources to support san antonio regional hospital's mission to improve the health and wellbeing of the people we serve.

Health
12
Legal Aid Society of San Diego

To improve lives by advancing justice through effective, efficient and vigorous legal advocacy, outreach and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covenant House Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION: $800 · OtherETERNAL WORD TELEVISIONBLESSED SACRAMENT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $300 · OtherBLESSED SACRAMENT CATHOLIC CHURCHOBLATE MISSIONS: $300 · OtherOBLATE MISSIONSSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $100 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $100 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESSAMM MINISTRIES: $100 · OtherSAMM MINISTRIES+2 more: $45 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $350 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE T…AARP FOUNDATION: $15 · Human ServicesCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthCHRISTUS CH…Ascension DePaul Services: $100 · HealthAscension D…PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $53 · HealthPARALYZED V…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $100 · International
Other$1,745Human Services$365Health$253International$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAscension DePaul Services: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN VETERANS FOUNDATION: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anderlitch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anderlitch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Autism Society of America Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anderlitch Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home