Skip to content

· Private foundation

AN&R Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$8.6MHuman Services$85kHealth$79kEducation$40kCommunity Improvement$4kYouth Development$3kInternational$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$100
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k44 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $54k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION AHAVAT SHALOM$20,000
CONGREGATION OHR MOSHE$13,500
AHAVA BABY INC$10,000
AHAVAT TORAH INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,600
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,600
Individual grant recipient$2,400
KOL YAAKOV$1,952
MASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
EFRAT$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $2k → 14%KEREN HATZEDAKAH: $6k → 11%THE CHEVRA GEMACH: $1k → 6%THE CHEVRA GEMACH: $500 → 6%BONEI OLAM: $18k → 20%MISASKIM: $2k → 20%MISASKIM: $360 → 20%AHAVA BABY INC: $10k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $180 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 55 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
149

Total granted

$7.5M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+36%

Still filing today

22%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    Yeshivat Lev Torah
    2× · 2021–2023 · $450k · revenue +126%
  • SF
    SAFE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $57k · revenue +11%
  • TK
    TIKKUN KLALI OLAMI INC CO LOUIS ASSOULIN
    2× · 2019–2020 · $21k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $236k
  • AS
    AHAVAT SHALOM
    one grant, 2023 · $163k
  • GB
    GEMAH BET YISRAEL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $118k · revenue -37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
4
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
5
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
7
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
8
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
9
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
10
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
11
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Ohel Torah; the most unlike its peers is Magen Abraham Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 233 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATERET TORAH CENTER: $3,941,052 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTERYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $1,081,550 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHYAD YOSEF: $842,505 · OtherYAD YOSEFOHEL SIMHA SUPER FUND: $404,800 · Other+163 more: $1,764,202 · Other+163 moreYeshivat Lev Torah: $450,000 · ReligionTIKKUN KLALI OLAMI INC CO LOUIS ASSOULIN: $21,101 · ReligionYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $18,280 · ReligionShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $18,000 · Religion+5 more: $30,652 · ReligionGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $118,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,800 · PhilanthropyBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $10,901 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $10,000 · EducationTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $10,000 · EducationMATTAN BASSETER INC: $9,200 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $8,100 · EducationMAGEN ABRAHAM INC: $3,600 · EducationBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $1,960 · EducationBonei Olam Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesAHAVA BABY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $2,340 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $1,800 · Human ServicesTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesNAOMI'S LEGACY INC: $3,600 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,307 · HealthREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $1,000 · HealthDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,802 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $1,800 · Youth DevelopmentMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $3,800 · Community Improvement
Other$8,034,109Religion$538,033Philanthropy$120,800Education$55,761Human Services$39,640Health$6,907Youth Development$4,602Community Improvement$3,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $450,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $118,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $57,001 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTIKKUN KLALI OLAMI INC CO LOUIS ASSOULIN: $21,101 over 2y, 16% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $18,280 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $18,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $10,901 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBNEI MELACHIM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAHAVA BABY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $9,200 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $8,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $8,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $6,401 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $3,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM INC: $3,600 over 1y, 100% of budgetNAOMI'S LEGACY INC: $3,600 over 1y, 38% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,802 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $2,801 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $2,650 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $2,340 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,307 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEZRA CORNMAN BAR MITZVAH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $960 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYL HEARTS Inc: $501 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗
  • Who funds GEMAH BET YISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIKKUN KLALI OLAMI INC CO LOUIS ASSOULIN ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY59.9× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AN&R Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AN&R Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 233 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on AN&R’s filings →

More from the funding graph