Skip to content
Amudei Chesed Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Amudei Chesed Inc

To provide financial assistance to religious, educational and charitable organizations worldwide to help them continue their activities.

$249k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Religion$187kInternational$20kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$8kPhilanthropy$7k
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $131,128, the rows itemized in this filing. The $249,429 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $118,301 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA OF FLATBUSH$53,500
GENERATIONS OF ISRAEL$16,450
CONGREGATION BNOT RACHEL$11,470
BNOT RACHEL HIGHSCHOOL$10,815
EMUNUS ISRAEL$10,000
BEER YITZCHOK$7,850
YAM HACHESED$7,800
AMERICAN FREINDS OF YESHIVAT HIDA$6,710
THE WEDDING EXPERIENCE$6,533
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FREINDS OF YESHIVA CHIDA: $33k → 13%GENERATIONS OF ISRAEL: $16k → 20%TOMCHE TZEDAKA: $9k → 11%AMERICAN FREINDS OF YESHIVAT HIDA: $7k → 13%CONGREGATION BNOT RACHEL: $13k → 20%YAM HACHESED: $8k → 11%BNOT RACHEL HIGHSCHOOL: $13k → 20%CONGREGATION BNOT RACHEL: $11k → 20%BNOT RACHEL HIGHSCHOOL: $11k → 20%GENERATIONS OF ISRAEL: $10k → 20%EMUNUS ISRAEL: $10k → 20%EMUNUS ISRAEL: $10k → 20%YESHIVA OF FLATBUSH: $54k → 20%BEER YITZCHOK: $11k → 20%BEER YITZCHOK: $8k → 20%THE WEDDING EXPERIENCE: $7k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$113k · 4 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +154% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$113k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+154%
0%

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
ReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNOT RACHEL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $48k
  • GO
    GENERATION OF ISRAEL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $26k · revenue +154%
  • CE
    CONGREATION EMUNAS YISROEL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FREINDS OF YESHIVA CHIDA
    one grant, 2022 · $33k
  • TT
    TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $53,500 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHCONGREGATION BNOT RACHEL: $48,245 · OtherCONGREGATION BNOT RACHELAMERICAN FREINDS OF YESHIVA CHIDA: $33,430 · OtherAMERICAN FREINDS OF YESHIVA CHIDACONGREATION EMUNAS YISROEL: $20,000 · OtherCONGREATION EMUNAS YISROELBEER YITZCHOK AD: $18,430 · OtherBEER YITZCHOK ADAMERICAN FREINDS OF YESHIVAT HIDA: $6,710 · OtherGENERATION OF ISRAEL INC: $26,390 · ReligionGENERATION OF ISRAEL …TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $9,486 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORPAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAM HACHESED: $7,800 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF Y…THE WEDDING EXPERIENCE INC: $6,533 · Philanthropy
Other$180,315Religion$43,676Philanthropy$6,533

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENERATION OF ISRAEL INC: $26,390 over 2y, 20% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $9,486 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAM HACHESED: $7,800 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE WEDDING EXPERIENCE INC: $6,533 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GENERATION OF ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAM HACHESED ↗
  • Who funds THE WEDDING EXPERIENCE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amudei Chesed Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amudei Chesed Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Amudei Chesed Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Amudei Chesed Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $177k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Amudei Chesed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home