Skip to content
American Subcontractors Assn of Ntx at a glance

· Public charity

American Subcontractors Assn of Ntx

Advocacy, education, networking and representation of construction subcontractors and suppliers

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$144kEducation$111kHealth$60kCommunity Improvement$48kPhilanthropy$10kHousing & Shelter$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$3k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $57,282, the rows itemized in this filing. The $74,302 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,020 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION$26,480
BE PRO BE PROUD$15,000
CORNERSTONE CAREER CENTER$10,000
HEARTS AND HAMMERS - DALLAS INC$5,802
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HAPPY HILL FARM: $21k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $19k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $16k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $15k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $10k → 10%HAPPY HILL FARM: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 6 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$318k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+67%

Still filing today

100%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +23%
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    3× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +145%
  • CC
    Cornerstone Career Center
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • DC
    DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • DC
    DALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +358%
  • CE
    CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Construction Career Collaborative

As an interdependent alliance of construction industry leaders, we are collectively committed to positively impacting the future of the industry by strengthening the safe, skilled, and sustainable craft workforce pipeline.

Public Benefit
2
American Council for Construction Education Inc

The mission of ACCE is to be a leading advocate of quality construction programs and to promote, support, and accredit quality construction education programs in colleges and universities.

—
3
Associated Builders & Contractors of South Texas Inc

Will provide the best training, government and legal representation, and programs to ensure members a competitive advantage, add value to the industry's clients, promote a safe work place and enhance the lives of the industry's employees.

—
4
The Real Estate Council Inc

Trec's mission is to cultivate relationships in the commercial real estate industry to catalyze community investment, influence policy, propel careers and develop the leaders of tomorrow.we believe relationships are the lifeblood of career…

—
5
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
6
Associated Builders & Contractors - Greater Michigan Chapter

ABC/Greater Michigan chapter is the publicly recognized leader in the construction industry. We support our members' success by providing technologically advanced assistance in the areas of education, business, and workforce development.…

—
7
Associated Builders and Contractors Eastern Pa Chapter Inc

Trade association

—
8
Texas Chapter of the American College of Cardiology

The purpose of the texas chapter of the american college of cardiology is to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases, and to foster the highest…

—
9
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
10
Acec Research Institute

Acec research institute serve as the leading source of knowledge and thought leadership for creating a more sustainable, safe, secure, and technically advanced built environment. identify, fund, and provide industry wide research forecasts…

Unclassified
11
Tex-E Inc
Education
12
Associated Builders & Contractors Central Texas Chapter I

Based on the merit shop philosophy, abc central texas helps our members develop people, win work, and deliver that work safely, ethically, and profitably for the betterment of the community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Construction Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $109,480 · EducationCONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCCornerstone Career Center: $30,000 · EducationCornerstone Career CenterDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $5,000 · EducationHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $86,150 · Human ServicesHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $54,650 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RI…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNIT…DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherDALLAS COUNTY…CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCONSTRUCTION …AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN SUBC…Hearts and Hammers - Dallas Inc: $5,802 · OtherHearts and Ha…AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON TX: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN SUBC…DALLAS POLICE ASSOCIATION'S ASSIST THE OFFICER FOUNDATION: $3,400 · OtherDALLAS POLICE…BE PRO BE PROUD INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementBE PRO BE P…TEXAS CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATION: $7,500 · Community ImprovementTEXAS CONST…
Education$154,480Human Services$86,150Health$59,650Other$44,202Community Improvement$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSTRUCTION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $109,480 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $86,150 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $54,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone Career Center: $30,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetBE PRO BE PROUD INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SUBCONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTEXAS CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Subcontractors Assn of Ntx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Subcontractors Assn of Ntx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Subcontractors Assn of Ntx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home