Skip to content

Virginia · Public charity

American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

To foster the optimal delivery of nuclear cardiology services.

$50k
Granted FY2019
1
Grants FY2019
1
Organizations funded FY2018
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of American Society of Nuclear Cardiology’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’18
0
’19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$50,000
States reached, FY2019
1
Total assets, FY2019
$9.5M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Health$50kEducation$50k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
St Lukes Hospital of Kansas City$50,00010%

Compare American Society of Nuclear Cardiology with peer funders

About American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

How much does American Society of Nuclear Cardiology give?
American Society of Nuclear Cardiology reported 1 grants totaling $50,000 in its FY2019 IRS filing.
What does American Society of Nuclear Cardiology fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2018, its largest causes are Health (50%), Education (50%).
Who are American Society of Nuclear Cardiology's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2018: St Lukes Hospital of Kansas City ($50k).
Where is American Society of Nuclear Cardiology based?
American Society of Nuclear Cardiology is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $35k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Society of Nuclear Cardiology’s filings →

More from the funding graph