Skip to content

· Public charity

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp)

The mission of pharmacists is to help people achieve optimal health outcomes.

$443k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$367k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.6MPublic Benefit$105kEducation$45kEmployment$20k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $412,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $443,050 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,800 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $250k+1 grant · $367k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$188M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASHP RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION$367,250
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$15,000
HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC$15,000
PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 10% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $15k → 11%ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM (DBA UNITED HOSPITAL): $15k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 22%UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $15k → 20%Lee Memorial Health System: $15k → 11%BEAUMONT HEALTH: $15k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $15k → 27%Avera McKennan Hospital & Univ Health Ctr: $15k → 9%ASHP RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $367k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $15k → 15%HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $15k → 11%Allina Health System (DBA United Hospital): $15k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 22%BEAUMONT HEALTH: $15k → 8%Regents of the Univ of MI: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $15k → 27%AVERA MCKENNAN: $15k → 9%ASHP RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $366k → 8%HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $15k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 22%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $15k → 14%Avera McKennan: $15k → 9%ASHP Research & Education Fdn: $364k → 8%HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $15k → 11%Avera McKennan: $15k → 9%ASHP Research & Education Foundation: $363k → 8%Hennepin Healthcare System Inc: $15k → 11%AVERA MCKENNAN: $15k → 9%ASHP Research & Education Foundation: $359k → 8%Hennepin Healthcare System Inc: $15k → 11%AVERA MCKENNAN: $15k → 9%ASHP RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $359k → 8%ASHP RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $358k → 8%ASHP RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $357k → 8%ASHP RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $353k → 8%THE PHARMACY TECHNICIAN SOCIETY INC: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
SD
PA
UT
KY
MD
NM
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 10 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$3.7M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FDTN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +28%
  • HH
    HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +41%
  • AM
    Avera McKennan
    6× · 2017–2022 · $90k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PHARMACY TECHNICIAN SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • LM
    LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
2
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp)

The mission of pharmacists is to help people achieve optimal health outcomes. ashp helps its members achieve this mission by advocating and supporting the professional practice of pharmacists in hospitals, health systems, ambulatory care…

—
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Healtheast Woodwinds Hospital

Fairview is driven to heal, discover, and educate for longer, healthier lives.

Health
8
Pinnacle Health Medical Services

Pinnacle health medical services is a charitable organization dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all the people of central pennsylvania by providing primary, clinic, family and specialty physician…

Health
9
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
10
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
11
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
12
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allina Health System; the most unlike its peers is American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Research and Education Fdtn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FDTN: $3,244,541 · ReligionAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FDTNHENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $90,000 · HealthHENNEPIN H…Avera McKennan: $90,000 · HealthAvera McKe…PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $45,000 · HealthPRESBYTERI…DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $45,000 · HealthDUKE UNIVE…ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM: $30,000 · HealthALLINA HEA…Beaumont Health: $30,000 · HealthBeaumont H…UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $30,000 · OtherTHE PHARMACY TECHNICIAN SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $15,000 · OtherLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $15,000 · Other
Religion$3,244,541Health$345,000Other$185,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FDTN: $3,244,541 over 9y, 15% of budgetHENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAvera McKennan: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeaumont Health: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FDTN ↗
  • Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds Avera McKennan ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds Beaumont Health ↗
  • Who funds THE PHARMACY TECHNICIAN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Society IncGA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph