Skip to content

New Mexico · Public charity

American Society for Mass Spectrometry

The continuing education and dissemination of research and information in the field of mass spectrometry and allied topics. Approximately 7,000 scientist members are involved in research and development.

$300k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
67%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$125k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$35,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$35,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 6
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$6.4M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 67% of the organizations American Society for Mass Spectrometry funded were first-time grantees, receiving 61% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$125k100%
FY20233$90k67%
FY20224$125k100%
FY20213$90k100%
FY20204$125k100%
FY20194$125k100%
FY20186$110k100%
FY20174$108kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$830kHealth$80kEducation$58k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
OK
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Georgia$70,0002n/a
Regents of the University of California at Riverside$35,0001n/a
University of Va-Gloria Sheynkman$35,0001n/a
Regents of the University of California$35,0001n/a
Cedars-Sinai Medical-Jesse Meyer$35,0001n/a
Univ of Washington-Nicholas Riley$35,0001n/a
University of Oklahoma$35,0001n/a
University of Utah$35,0001n/a
University of Washington$35,0001n/a
The Ohio State University$35,0001n/a
Show all 31 grantees
All grantees of American Society for Mass Spectrometry by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Georgia$70,0002n/a
Regents of the University of California at Riverside$35,0001n/a
University of Va-Gloria Sheynkman$35,0001n/a
Regents of the University of California$35,0001n/a
Cedars-Sinai Medical-Jesse Meyer$35,0001n/a
Univ of Washington-Nicholas Riley$35,0001n/a
University of Oklahoma$35,0001n/a
University of Utah$35,0001n/a
University of Washington$35,0001n/a
The Ohio State University$35,0001n/a
Indiana University School of Medicine$35,0001n/a
University of Maryland College Park Foundation Inc$35,0001n/a
Colorado Energy Office$35,0001n/a
Baylor College of Medicine$35,00010%
University of Arizona$35,0001n/a
The University of Tennessee$35,0001n/a
University of Oregon$35,0001n/a
Maryland University$35,0001n/a
Texas A&M Agrilife Research$35,0001n/a
Board of Trustees of Illinois State University$20,0001n/a
Furman University$20,00010%
University of Minnesota$20,0001n/a
St John's University New York$20,00010%
James Madison University$20,0001n/a
George Fox University$20,00010%
Ft Lewis College-Callie Cole$20,0001n/a
Vanderbilt University$18,00010%
Florida State University$10,0001n/a
Regents of the University of California at San Diego$10,0001n/a
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$10,0001n/a
University of Wisconsin Madison$10,0001n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare American Society for Mass Spectrometry with peer funders

About American Society for Mass Spectrometry

How much does American Society for Mass Spectrometry give?
American Society for Mass Spectrometry reported 4 itemized grants totaling $125,000, out of $300,221 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does American Society for Mass Spectrometry fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Science & Tech (86%), Health (8%), Education (6%).
Who are American Society for Mass Spectrometry's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: University of Georgia ($70k), Regents of the University of California at Riverside ($35k), University of Va-Gloria Sheynkman ($35k).
Does American Society for Mass Spectrometry fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as American Society for Mass Spectrometry?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Tulsa Community Foundation.
Where is American Society for Mass Spectrometry based?
American Society for Mass Spectrometry is based in NM.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Society for Mass Spectrometry’s filings →

More from the funding graph