Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Priorities Committee Inc

American priorities committee (apc) is focused on building a future where our country is more prosperous, more secure, and more free.

$7.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $500k
  • $250k+7 grants · $7.2M
$500,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$436k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OVER THE HORIZON ACTION$1,850,000
AMERICA FIRST WORKS INC$1,625,000
SECURING AMERICAN GREATNESS INC$1,000,000
PROSPERITY ALLIANCE INC$1,000,000
AMERICAN JOBS AND GROWTH FUND$900,000
AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE$500,000
AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM INSTITUTE$300,000
RESTORING INTEGRITY AND TRUST IN ELECTIONS$200,000
CAROLINA PARTNERSHIP FOR REFORM INC$100,000
WORKING FOR AMERICA POLICY INC$100,000
RIGHT VOTE INC$100,000
TURNING POINT ACTION INC$25,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TURNING POINT ACTION INC: $25k → 11%AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE: $500k → 11%AMERICA FIRST WORKS INC: $1.6M → 14%SECURING AMERICAN GREATNESS INC: $1.0M → 11%CAROLINA PARTNERSHIP FOR REFORM INC: $100k → 8%PROSPERITY ALLIANCE INC: $1.0M → 6%RIGHT VOTE INC: $100k → 14%AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM INSTITUTE: $300k → 6%RESTORING INTEGRITY AND TRUST IN ELECTIONS: $200k → 14%AMERICAN JOBS AND GROWTH FUND: $900k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Policy Coalition

With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.

Public Benefit
2
American Advancement

Promote public policies aimed at removing barriers to economic growth and advancing economic opportunity for the American people.

3
American Prosperity Alliance

American Prosperity Alliances mission is to advocate for legislative and regulatory policies that advance economic prosperity in America.

4
Government Integrity Fund

To Conduct research and educate the public about various policy issues across the United States.

5
American Jobs and Security

American Jobs and Security was formed to promote the idea of peace and prosperity through strong security policies.

6
21st Century Policy Institute

21st Century Policy Institute engages in public policy advocacy including advocacy to sustain a dialog around the critical importance of Americas economic and military strength and the related implications both domestically and abroad.

7
Economic Future Fund

Economic Future Fund aims to build a stronger, more vibrant economy for the American people through innovative public policies and free market solutions.

8
Citizens for a Working America Inc

To promote sound economic policy: 1 By engaging in citizen led initiative and referendum efforts, 2 By participating in the public policy arena, and 3 By providing educational services to the general public.

9
A Public Voice Inc

The organization's mission is to promote the common good and general welfare by supporting direct democracy efforts, which give the public a direct voice in the operation of state and local government through the approval or defeat of…

Public Benefit
10
Institute for Policy Innovation

It is the mission of the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI) to provide education, research, analysis and recommendations to policy makers, opinion leaders and the American people designed to help solve public policy problems through…

11
Defend Us Inc

The organization works to defend, protect, and advance bedrock American values.

12
Great America Coalition

To educate the public on policy issues.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America First Policy Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is America First Works Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Over the Horizon Action — $1,850,000 · OtherOver the Horizon ActionAMERICA FIRST WORKS INC — $1,625,000 · OtherAMERICA FIRST WORKS INCSECURING AMERICAN GREATNESS INC — $1,000,000 · OtherSECURING AMERICAN GREATNESS INCAmerican Jobs and Growth Fund — $900,000 · OtherAmerican Jobs and Growth FundRESTORING INTEGRITY AND TRUST IN ELECTIONS — $200,000 · Other+2 more — $125,000 · OtherProsperity Alliance Inc — $1,000,000 · Public BenefitProsperity Allia…CAROLINA PARTNERSHIP FOR REFORM INC — $100,000 · Public BenefitCAROLINA PARTNER…AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $500,000 · EducationAmerican Exceptionalism Institute — $300,000 · Community ImprovementRight Vote Inc — $100,000 · Civil Rights
Other$5,700,000Public Benefit$1,100,000Education$500,000Community Improvement$300,000Civil Rights$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTURNING POINT ACTION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Priorities Committee Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Priorities Committee Inc?

    Find your warmest path to American Priorities Committee Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph