Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Physical Therapy Association Private Practice Section

To foster interest in and provide for the growth of physical therapy in practice settings which allow for independent practice of physical therapy, business success, and provision of quality of care which allow for independent practice of physical therapy, business success, and provision of quality of care.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of American Physical Therapy Association Private Practice Section’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,336 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,336 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Missouri Physical Therapy Association$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GASPAR PHYSICAL THERAPY: $50k → 11%TEXAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 10%MISSOURI PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION: $25k → 10%PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON: $10k → 9%ALABAMA PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 4%INSTITUTE OF PRIVATE PRACTICE PHYSICAL THERAPY: $40k → 9%GASPAR PHYSICAL THERAPY: $25k → 11%MISSOURI PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%ALABAMA PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 4%INSTITUTE OF PRIVATE PRACTICE PHYSICAL THERAPY: $30k → 9%Missouri Physical Therapy Association: $10k → 10%INSTITUTE OF PRIVATE PRACTICE PHYSICAL THERAPY: $23k → 9%ALABAMA PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$274k · 4 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$274k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
0%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR PRIVATE PRACTICE PHYSICAL THERAPY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $124k · revenue -13% · 52% of their budget
  • GP
    GASPAR PHYSICAL THERAPY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $75k
  • MP
    MISSOURI PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • TP
    TEXAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • AW
    APTA WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
1/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INSTITUTE FOR PRIVATE PRACTICE PHYSICAL THERAPY — $124,442 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR PRIVATE PRACTICE PHYSICAL THERAPYGASPAR PHYSICAL THERAPY — $75,000 · OtherGASPAR PHYSICAL THERAPYMISSOURI PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION — $45,000 · OtherMISSOURI PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATIONAlabama Physical Therapy Association Chapter of the APTA — $30,000 · OtherAlabama Physical Therapy Association Chapter of the APTATEXAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · OtherAPTA WASHINGTON — $10,000 · Other
Other$299,442

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINSTITUTE FOR PRIVATE PRACTICE PHYSICAL THERAPY — $124,442 over 4y, 52% of budgetMISSOURI PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION — $45,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetAlabama Physical Therapy Association Chapter of the APTA — $30,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Physical Therapy Association Private Practice Section funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph