Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Otological Society Research Foundation

Continue the improvement of patient care by the advancement of physician knowledge of otology through research.

$499k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of AMERICAN OTOLOGICAL SOCIETY RESEARCH FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $209k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $290k
$44,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN OTOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$80,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$55,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$44,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$44,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$44,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$44,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$33,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $5k → 15%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $44k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $44k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-SAN FRANCISCO: $99k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (UCSF): $55k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $44k → 14%See Schedule O: $50k → 13%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $30k → 17%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $44k → 22%AMERICAN OTOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $100k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $55k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $55k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $80k → 15%See Schedule O: $80k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $33k → 11%See Schedule O: $50k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $44k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $65k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO-DENVER: $44k → 12%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $44k → 18%See Schedule O: $60k → 15%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $55k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $80k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER: $55k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $44k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $55k → 19%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $44k → 16%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (UCSF): $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $42k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $80k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $55k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $44k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $80k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER: $55k → 23%HUGO MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KREIGER: $66k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES (UCLA): $44k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $55k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $44k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $80k → 9%MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $80k → 14%See Schedule O: $50k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY: $44k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $80k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $44k → 15%MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY: $44k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $65k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $44k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
MS
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 27% of American Otological Society Research Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

American Otological Society Research Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 11 repeat orgs$957k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$1.6M
$648k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+9%

Still filing today

9%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $309k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    State University of Iowa
    4× · 2020–2025 · $264k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    3× · 2021–2023 · $240k
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $205k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $99k · revenue -85%
  • HW
    HUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $66k · revenue +10%
  • NY
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2020 · $66k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Associates Inc

MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR ASSOCIATES, INC. ("MEEA") IS A SPECIALTY PHYSICIAN GROUP PRACTICE. IT PROVIDES CARE FOR PATIENTS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY, INC. ("MEEI"), A RELATED ORGANIZATION. THE PRACTICE SPECIALIZES IN…

Health
7
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
8
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
9
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
10
University of Rochester

The provision of higher education in the liberal arts and sciences, medicine and dentistry, nursing and music; research; and charitable patient care services.

Education
11
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
12
Marshall B Ketchum University

To educate caring, inspired health care professionals who are prepared to deliver collaborative, patient-centric health care in an interprofessional environment.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University and the most unlike its peers is Radford Sch Brd-King Award Ta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

State University of Iowa — $264,000 · OtherState University of IowaUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $240,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $154,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $153,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHUNIVERSITY OF MISS MEDICAL CENTER — $110,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISS MEDICAL CENTERREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $88,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $86,121 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $68,750 · OtherNEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $66,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA — $55,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY — $55,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $55,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $55,000 · Other+6 more — $186,000 · Other+6 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $310,800 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $205,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $93,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard …University of Miami — $55,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $55,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $44,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $44,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $33,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $30,000 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY — $138,000 · HealthMASSACHUSETTS …AMERICAN OTOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN OTOLO…UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $99,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF …Boston Pediatric Neurosurgical Foundation Inc — $44,000 · HealthBoston Pediatr…HUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC — $66,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,635,871Education$869,800Health$381,000Science & Tech$66,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $310,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $205,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY — $138,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN OTOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $93,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC — $66,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $44,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $44,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $33,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY
  • Who funds AMERICAN OTOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds HUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds RADFORD SCH BRD-KING AWARD TA
  • Who funds Boston Pediatric Neurosurgical Foundation Inc
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New YorkNY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Otological Society Research Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Hugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger Inc36% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University11% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Otological Society Research Foundation?

Find your warmest path to American Otological Society Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph