Skip to content
American Nurses Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Nurses Association Inc

To advance and promote the improvement of health standards and the standards of nursing and to stimulate and promote the professional development of nurses.

$980k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$653kFood & Nutrition$42kEducation$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $87,280, the rows itemized in this filing. The $979,807 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $892,527 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$105M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL COALITION OF ETHNIC MINORITY NURSE ASSOCIATIONS INC$60,000
CHI ETA PHI SORORITY$10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN NURSES OF AMERICA INC$10,000
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$7,280
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRONTIER HEALTH & RESOURCES: $50k → 10%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN NURSES OF AMERICA INC: $10k → 7%INSPIREN: $50k → 20%CHI ETA PHI SORORITY: $10k → 14%FITSI HEALTH LLC: $25k → 12%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $7k → 19%EVERGREEN MARKETING INC: $17k → 4%NATIONAL COALITION OF ETHNIC MINORITY NURSE ASSOCIATIONS INC: $60k → 13%AMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC: $411k → 8%NATIONAL STUDENT NURSES ASSOCIATION: $10k → 20%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
NV
PA
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC: $410,667 · EducationAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INCMONTANA NURSES ASSOCIATION: $77,517 · OtherMONTANA NURSES ASSOCIATIONINSPIREN: $50,000 · OtherINSPIRENFRONTIER HEALTH & RESOURCES: $50,000 · OtherFRONTIER HEALTH & RESOURCESMCI USA: $25,000 · OtherMCI USAFITSI HEALTH LLC: $25,000 · OtherFITSI HEALTH LLCEVERGREEN MARKETING INC: $17,300 · OtherEVERGREEN MARKETING INCNATIONAL STUDENT NURSES' ASSOCIATIONINC: $10,000 · OtherCHI ETA PHI SORORITY INC: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $7,280 · OtherNATIONAL COALITION OF ETHNIC MINORITY NURSE ASSOCIATIONS INC: $60,000 · HealthNATIONAL CO…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL AS…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN NURS: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL AS…
Education$410,667Other$272,097Health$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC: $410,667 over 1y, 16% of budgetMONTANA NURSES ASSOCIATION: $77,517 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION OF ETHNIC MINORITY NURSE ASSOCIATIONS INC: $60,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHI ETA PHI SORORITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN NURS: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Nurses Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Nurses Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • National Association of School Nurses: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Nurses Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home