Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Meat Science Association

Exclusively for educational purposes to foster community and professional development among individuals who create and apply science to efficiently provide safe and high quality meat.

$223k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Food & Nutrition$98kEducation$80kScience & Tech$60kAnimals$26kEmployment$15k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS$26,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO$25,000
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$25,000
WEST TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY$25,000
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$23,300
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$15,000
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 44% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $25k → 16%WEST TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY: $25k → 9%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 10%NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 23%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS: $26k → 9%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $23k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
WI
MI
NV
SD
NE
MO
NM
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20232024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

151 PREM S PAUL RESEARCH CENTER — $60,000 · Other151 PREM S PAUL RESEARCH CENTERUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS — $26,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLSUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO — $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENOUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO — $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IDAHOTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA — $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKAWEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · OtherWEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY — $23,300 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI — $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Other
Other$279,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Meat Science Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph