Skip to content

· Public charity

American Leprosy Missions Inc

The vision and principal ends of alm are to work as christ's servants, freeing the world of leprosy, buruli ulcer and related diseases by serving as a channel of the love of christ to people affected by these diseases, helping them to be healed in body and spirit and to be restored to lives of dignity and usefulness within their…

$9.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.4MInternational$557kScience & Tech$66kReligion$66kCommunity Improvement$15k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $76,655, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,077,864 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,001,209 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$46,147
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAP INTERNATIONAL$46,147
BIOMEME$30,508
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP: $49k → 6%BIOMEME: $36k → 22%ILLUMINA INC: $35k → 11%LET PEOPLE SEE: $15k → 10%LYMPHATEC INC: $8k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $21k → 14%MAP INTERNATIONAL INC: $107k → 14%BIOTECT SERVICES: $47k → 11%MILER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP: $17k → 9%CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH: $11k → 4%STRATEGIC APPLICATIONS FOR SOCIETY LLC: $8k → 6%NATIONAL HANSEN'S DISEASE PROGRAMS: $80k → 19%TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP: $43k → 6%BIOMEME: $31k → 22%MAP INTERNATIONAL INC: $82k → 14%BIOTECT SERVICES: $32k → 11%MILER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP: $13k → 9%CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH: $10k → 4%NATIONAL HANSEN'S DISEASE PROGRAMS: $64k → 19%BIOMEME INC: $268k → 22%MAP INTERNATIONAL INC: $80k → 14%BIOTECT SERVICES: $24k → 11%MILER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP: $6k → 9%NATIONAL HANSEN'S DISEASE PROGRAMS: $9k → 19%BIOMEME INC: $156k → 22%MAP INTERNATIONAL INC: $78k → 14%MALCOLM DUTHIE CONSULTING: $8k → 9%BIOMEME INC: $94k → 22%MAP INTERNATIONAL INC: $56k → 14%INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $488k → 9%MAP INTERNATIONAL: $46k → 14%INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $485k → 9%MAP INTERNATIONAL INC: $34k → 14%INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $220k → 9%MAP INTERNATIONAL INC: $28k → 14%INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $139k → 9%INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $109k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CA
CO
VA
SC
LA
GA

Grants abroad, by region: $9.0M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$7.6M · 84% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: HEALING · CHRISTIAN PARTNERSHIPS · TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION

South Asia$749k · 8% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: HEALING · CHRISTIAN PARTNERSHIPS · TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$657k · 7% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION · CHRISTIAN PARTNERSHIPS · HEALING

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 8 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$2.9M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+31%

Still filing today

38%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    ACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.4M · revenue -22%
  • BI
    BIOMEME INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $584k
  • MAP International Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $513k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • GO
    GLOBAL OUTREACH MISSION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +22%
  • II
    Illumina Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • WV
    WORLD VISION INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2020 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTE: $1,440,946 · HealthACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTEBIOMEME INC: $584,228 · OtherBIOMEME INCNATIONAL HANSEN'S DISEASE PROGRAMS: $152,300 · OtherNATIONAL HANSEN'S DISEASE PROGRAMSBIOTECT SERVICES: $104,064 · OtherBIOTECT SERVICESTROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP: $91,545 · OtherTROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP+9 more: $161,299 · Other+9 moreMAP International Inc: $512,605 · InternationalMAP International I…CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH: $21,125 · InternationalGLOBAL OUTREACH MISSION INC: $50,000 · ReligionCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $22,605 · Education
Health$1,440,946Other$1,093,436International$533,730Religion$50,000Education$22,605

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTE: $1,440,946 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetMAP International Inc: $512,605 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH MISSION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $22,605 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH: $21,125 over 2y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Leprosy Missions Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Leprosy Missions Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Leprosy Missions Inc?

    Find your warmest path to American Leprosy Missions Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Leprosy Missions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph