Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Science & Tech$722kEducation$127kEnvironment$117k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $40,851 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,109,967 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,069,116 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$136M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NABG$20,936
ORGANIZED UPLIFTING RESOURCES & STRATEGIES$8,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE$6,415
HOLLYGROVE DIXON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAGE: $20k → 10%NABG: $21k → 16%ORGANIZED UPLIFTING RESOURCES & STRATEGIES: $8k → 17%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $18k → 14%ANTHROPOCENE ALLIANCE: $45k → 19%COMMUNITY COLLEGE PARTNERS CAMPUS INC: $27k → 8%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 19%THE BOARD TRUSTEES UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS: $221k → 19%PUBLIC LABORATORY: $60k → 23%POLARIS INSIGHTS INC: $36k → 8%SUMMER OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICAL EXPERIENCE: $20k → 10%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $18k → 14%THE BOARD TRUSTEES UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS: $192k → 19%PUBLIC LABORATORY: $30k → 23%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $14k → 14%THE BOARD TRUSTEES UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS: $162k → 19%HOLLYGROVE DIXON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: $6k → 23%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $14k → 14%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $12k → 14%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $11k → 14%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $6k → 14%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
IN
CA
MD
SC
DC
LA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $175k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$71k · 41% · 69 people

Stated purpose: TRAVEL AND OTHER GRANT

East Asia and the Pacific$32k · 18% · 11 people

Stated purpose: TRAVEL AND OTHER GRANT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$28k · 16% · 20 people

Stated purpose: TRAVEL AND OTHER GRANT

Sub-Saharan Africa$26k · 15% · 17 people

Stated purpose: TRAVEL AND OTHER GRANT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$14k · 8% · 14 people

Stated purpose: TRAVEL AND OTHER GRANT

Middle East and North Africa$4k · 2% · 4 people

Stated purpose: TRAVEL AND OTHER GRANT

South America$500 · 0% · 1 person

Stated purpose: TRAVEL AND OTHER GRANT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$803k · 4 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$803k
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+73%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationScience & TechPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $574k
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +31%
  • PL
    PUBLIC LABORATORY FOR OPEN TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $90k · revenue -98% · 44% of their budget

Funded once

  • AA
    ANTHROPOCENE ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue +73%
  • PI
    POLARIS INSIGHTS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $36k
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $27k · revenue -38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $573,948 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISPOLARIS INSIGHTS INC — $36,000 · OtherPOLARIS INSIGHTS INC+2 more — $28,000 · OtherPUBLIC LABORATORY FOR OPEN TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE INC — $90,000 · EducationPUBLIC LABORATORY…SUMMER OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICAL EXPERIENCE — $40,000 · EducationSUMMER OF APPLIED…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK GEOSCIENTISTS — $20,936 · EducationNATIONAL ASSOCIAT…AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE — $99,490 · Science & TechAMERICAN AS…ANTHROPOCENE ALLIANCE — $45,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCOMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC — $27,000 · Public BenefitHOLLYGROVE NEIGHBORS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION — $5,500 · Community Improvement
Other$637,948Education$150,936Science & Tech$99,490Public Safety & Disaster$45,000Public Benefit$27,000Community Improvement$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE — $99,490 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC LABORATORY FOR OPEN TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE INC — $90,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetANTHROPOCENE ALLIANCE — $45,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSUMMER OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICAL EXPERIENCE — $40,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC — $27,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK GEOSCIENTISTS — $20,936 over 1y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Geophysical Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Anthropocene Alliance0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph