· Public charity
American Gaming Association
With membership representing every corner of the gaming industry, the aga serves as the industry's champion across the country by advocating on consequential industry issues.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $449,030 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $459,880 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,850 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NO SLOTS ON MAIN STREET | $200,000 |
| JCM FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| PLUS COMMUNICATIONS LLC | $75,000 |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE | $30,000 |
| GLOBAL GAMING WOMEN | $25,000 |
| ASSOCIATION OF STATE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE AGENCIES | $13,000 |
| WORLD GOLF FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| A SAFER VIRGINIA | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC | $5,880 |
| THE TORCH RELAY FOR CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS | $5,150 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GGGLOBAL GAMING WOMEN CHARITABLE EDUCATION8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +588%
- COConference of Western Attorneys General AG Alliance6× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +223%
- ICInternational Center for Responsible Gaming2× · 2018–2020 · $113k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- GGOFUNDMEORGgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +719%
- JGJCMAGA GOLF CLASSICone grant, 2017 · $50k
- CECOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +76%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
Aca international contributes to the success of its members, the positive reputation of the industry and the health of the economy. we accomplish this by 1) being the comprehensive, knowledge-based resource for the credit and collection…
Promoting excellence, education, professionalism and collegiality in the culinary profession
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates
To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.
To provide information about public policy and national policy alternatives to leaders in business, government, religion, and academia.
We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Union and the most unlike its peers is The Jcm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds No Slots on Main Street ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GAMING WOMEN CHARITABLE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Conference of Western Attorneys General AG Alliance ↗
- Who funds Americans for Tax Reform ↗
- Who funds THE JCM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds International Center for Responsible Gaming ↗
- Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
- Who funds US TRAVEL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE ↗
- Who funds THE TORCH RELAY FOR CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION INC ↗
- Who funds The Greater Las Vegas Chamber of Commerc ↗
- Who funds DESTINATIONS & TRAVEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Congressional Award Foundation ↗
- Who funds VICE PRESIDENT'S RESIDENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF STATE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE AGENCIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National District Attorneys Association ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS POLITICAL EDU CATION AND LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CONSUMER ACTION FOR A STRONG ECONOMY INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Gaming Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.