Skip to content

· Public charity

American Friends of Yeshivas Toras Moshe

Support of religious study and testing for credit recommendations subject to the approval of national ccrs, a program of the board of regents of the university of the state of new york.

$788k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$231kEducation$99k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $57,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $787,880 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $730,880 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSORTIUM FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES$45,000
CONGREGATION ZICHRON REFOEL INC$6,000
YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON MOSHE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA MEAH SHEARIM: $6k → 13%YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF NORTH BERGEN: $8k → 14%YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON MOSHE: $6k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BH FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%MERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL: $20k → 11%CONSORTIUM FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: $100k → 20%CONGREGATION ZICHRON REFOEL INC: $6k → 11%CIS: $62k → 20%CONSORTIUM FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: $45k → 20%CIS: $22k → 20%CONSORTIUM FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: $20k → 20%TAL: $15k → 20%CONSORTIUM FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES: $15k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $1.0M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$885k · 85% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$157k · 15% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONSORTIUM FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES INC: $263,500 · ReligionCONSORTIUM FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES INC+1 more: $5,200 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETANYA INC: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF N…FRIENDS OF YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE INC: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF YESHIVA TO…YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF NORTH BERGEN: $8,200 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF NO…YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON MOSHE: $6,000 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHR…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA MEAH SHEARIM INC: $6,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF Y…CONGREGATION ZICHRON REFOEL INC: $6,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON …
Religion$268,700Other$61,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSORTIUM FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES INC: $263,500 over 6y, 29% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETANYA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetFRIENDS OF YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BH FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 over 1y, 7.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Friends of Yeshivas Toras Moshe funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Friends of Yeshivas Toras Moshe. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Friends of Yeshivas Toras Moshe?

    Find your warmest path to American Friends of Yeshivas Toras Moshe through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Friends of Yeshivas Toras Moshe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph