Skip to content
American Friends of Netanya Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Friends of Netanya Inc

Support of educational institutions and 501(c)(3) organizations

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$735kEducation$119kHuman Services$62k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $61,411, the rows itemized in this filing. The $154,440 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $93,029 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$10,461
Median grant
2
States reached
$300k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOSDOS YAAKOV VYISROEL$15,500
CONGREGATION KESSER BAIS YAAKOV$12,000
CONGREGATION BNEI YEHUDA$10,461
TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF NJ$10,000
YESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM$7,450
TOURO COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHASDEI SHIMON: $20k → 11%CHASDEI SHIMON: $13k → 11%CHASDEI SHIMON: $10k → 11%CHASDEI SHIMON: $10k → 11%AHAVAS TZEDAKOS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $66k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$66k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: EDUCATIONAL

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$622k · 23 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
27

Total granted

$622k
$284k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+18%

Still filing today

70%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHASDEI SHIMON INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $53k · revenue +121%
  • MY
    Mosdos Yaakov Vyisroel
    3× · 2023–2025 · $37k · revenue +36%
  • TA
    TALMUDICAL ACADEMY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $37k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CV
    CHANUN VRACHUM
    one grant, 2021 · $38k
  • BA
    BMG ALUMNI INC
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC
    one grant, 2018 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
6
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
7
Toras Chaim Development Company Inc

Provide a building for a religious school.

Education
8
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
9
Yeshivas D'var Torah Inc

Organization raises funds which are disbursed to religious schools of higher education and talmudic research

Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Heichal Yerushalayim Inc

The funding of heichal yerushalayim yeshiva(religious shcool) to facilitate and promote judaic studies.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Mosdot Limmudei Lottie Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON MOSHE: $74,475 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON MOSHECHABAD OF WATERMILL INC: $40,000 · OtherCHABAD OF WATERMILL INCYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC: $39,350 · OtherYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INCCHANUN VRACHUM: $37,597 · OtherCHANUN VRACHUMCONGREGATION KESSER BAIS YAAKOV: $32,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KESSER BAIS YAAKOVBAIS AHARON INC: $26,100 · OtherBMG ALUMNI INC: $22,000 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF BRICK INC: $21,600 · OtherKOLLEL OHEL TORAH: $19,050 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $18,200 · Other+19 more: $161,441 · Other+19 moreMosdos Yaakov Vyisroel: $37,250 · EducationMosdos Yaakov VyisroelCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $35,000 · EducationCHEDER TORAS ZEVAmerican Friends of the Morris M Horowitz Kollel: $30,000 · EducationAmerican Friends of the Mor…TOURO UNIVERSITY: $28,000 · EducationTOURO UNIVERSITYYESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV: $22,250 · EducationYESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOVBAIS MEDRASH ZICHRON MEIR INC: $22,000 · EducationBAIS MEDRASH ZICHRON MEIR I…YESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $16,950 · EducationYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAMYESHIVA HEICHAL HATORAH INC: $11,850 · EducationTORAS SHRAGA INC DBA YESHIVA KINYAN HATORAH: $10,000 · EducationAmerican Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc: $10,000 · EducationTALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $36,650 · ReligionTALMUDICA…CHABAD LUBAVITCH MITZVAH TANK: $15,000 · ReligionCHABAD LU…YESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $14,000 · ReligionYESHIVAS …YESHIVA EITZ CHAIM OF HILLSIDE INC: $12,300 · ReligionYESHIVA E…CHASDEI SHIMON INC: $52,550 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $9,550 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF MOSDOT LIMMUDEI LOTTIE INC: $12,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA TIFERES CHAIM INC: $12,200 · InternationalTorat Shraga Inc: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC: $16,150 · PhilanthropyHADAR BAIS YAAKOV INC: $10,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC: $5,200 · Arts & Culture
Other$491,813Education$223,300Religion$77,950Human Services$62,100International$29,700Philanthropy$26,650Arts & Culture$5,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHASDEI SHIMON INC: $52,550 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC: $39,350 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMosdos Yaakov Vyisroel: $37,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $36,650 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of the Morris M Horowitz Kollel: $30,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY: $28,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV: $22,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH ZICHRON MEIR INC: $22,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $16,950 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC: $16,150 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH MITZVAH TANK: $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYESHIVA EITZ CHAIM OF HILLSIDE INC: $12,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA TIFERES CHAIM INC: $12,200 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetYESHIVA HEICHAL HATORAH INC: $11,850 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHADAR BAIS YAAKOV INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $9,550 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTorat Shraga Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHASDEI SHIMON INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds Mosdos Yaakov Vyisroel ↗
  • Who funds TALMUDICAL ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CHEDER TORAS ZEV ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of the Morris M Horowitz Kollel ↗
  • Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds BAIS MEDRASH ZICHRON MEIR INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD LUBAVITCH MITZVAH TANK ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOSDOT LIMMUDEI LOTTIE INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA EITZ CHAIM OF HILLSIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA TIFERES CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA HEICHAL HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds HADAR BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAS SHRAGA INC DBA YESHIVA KINYAN HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundDonors Fund IncJewish Communal FundToras Chesed IncJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Community Foun…Harry H Beren Foundat…Sff FoundationThe Zev and Susan Mun…Gemach of Jackson IncThe Moshe and Frady K…Tidewater Jewish Foun…
The Ojc FundNY42× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Toras Chesed Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Harry H Beren Foundation Ig · Sff Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Gemach of Jackson Inc · The Moshe and Frady Kalter Foundation Inc C/O Moshe Kalter · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Friends of Netanya Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Friends of Netanya Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Cheder Toras Zev: 22% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Chayei Olam: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Friends of Netanya’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home