Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs - Ak

To protect the rights and imrprove the working conditions of working alaskans.

$439k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$136k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGS - AK’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $394,764 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $439,461 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,697 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $291k
$40,915
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$136,290
907 INITIATIVE$80,000
PUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEE$75,000
Individual grant recipient$40,915
PENSION TRUSTEE ADVISORS$24,559
Individual grant recipient$20,000
HAYS RESEARCH GROUP LLC$18,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 24%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 24%AK BLADES: $5k → 10%PUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEE: $75k → 22%PUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEE: $60k → 22%PUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEE: $31k → 22%PUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEE: $30k → 22%PUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEE: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20202024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEE — $145,500 · OtherPUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEEIndividual grant recipient — $136,290 · OtherIndividual grant recipient907 INITIATIVE — $80,000 · Other907 INITIATIVEPUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEE — $60,000 · OtherPUTTING ALASKA FIRST COMMITTEEIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $40,915 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPENSION TRUSTEE ADVISORS — $24,559 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · Other+2 more — $23,000 · Other
Other$580,264

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph