Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Dental Education Association

To develop a future-ready oral health workforce prepared to improve the health of all people and communities through leadership, education and collaboration.

$394k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.6MEducation$246kScience & Tech$99kCivil Rights$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $96,470 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $394,291 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $297,821 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION$67,825
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$10,000
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$7,500
STUDENT NATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION$6,000
CENTER FOR ORAL HEALTH$5,145
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%STUDENT NATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 11%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PACIFIC: $15k → 10%THE DIVERSE DENTAL SOCIETY: $8k → 11%CENTER FOR ORAL HEALTH: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC: $21k → 12%WESTERN UNIV OF HEALTH & SCI: $8k → 14%HISPANIC DENTAL ASSOCIATION: $8k → 9%NYU - DEPT OF POPULATION HEALTH: $12k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $15k → 16%National Academy of Sciences: $50k → 14%CAPGENUS LLC: $10k → 15%THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $15k → 15%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $6k → 14%University of MO-KS City of School Dentistry: $18k → 15%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY: $15k → 14%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $25k → 20%University of Washington: $25k → 9%LSU HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION: $22k → 23%Tufts University: $25k → 16%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $12k → 17%WILLIAM J GIES FOUNDATION: $988k → 14%STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $9k → 15%TRUSTEE OF COLUMBIA UNIV OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $14k → 17%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $40k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $11k → 17%William J Gies Foundation: $18k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE: $16k → 14%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $8k → 14%WILLIAM J GIES FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%WILLIAM J GIES FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CT
CA
MO
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 5 repeat orgs$390k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
21

Total granted

$1.5M
$369k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    American Dental Association
    4× · 2020–2025 · $281k · revenue +91%
  • NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    4× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +15%
  • UO
    University of the Pacific
    2× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +37%
  • EC
    EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology Inc

The organization provides peer reviewed scientific research and education in the field of biological dentistry.

Health
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
10
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the Pacific and the most unlike its peers is Diverse Dental Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE WILLIAM J GIES FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF DENTISTRY OF THE ADEA — $1,041,779 · OtherTHE WILLIAM J GIES FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF DENTISTRY OF THE ADEAAmerican Dental Association — $280,825 · OtherAmerican Dental AssociationUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT — $75,000 · Other+14 more — $177,879 · Other+14 moreUniversity of the Pacific — $35,993 · EducationUniversity…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…Trustees of Tufts College — $25,000 · EducationTrustees o…New York University — $22,985 · EducationNew York U…MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $15,000 · EducationMEHARRY ME…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $14,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTE…DREXEL UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationDREXEL UNI…PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationPACIFIC UN…+1 more — $5,308 · EducationNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $113,750 · Science & TechLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS — $21,986 · HealthDiverse Dental Society — $7,500 · HealthHispanic Dental Association — $7,500 · Health
Other$1,575,483Education$178,286Science & Tech$113,750Health$36,986

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WILLIAM J GIES FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF DENTISTRY OF THE ADEA — $1,041,779 over 4y, 77% of budgetAmerican Dental Association — $280,825 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $113,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific — $35,993 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $22,985 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS — $21,986 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDiverse Dental Society — $7,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHispanic Dental Association — $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $5,308 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ORAL HEALTH — $5,145 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Dental Education Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Pacific University2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph