Skip to content
American College of Radiology Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the practice of radiology.

$5.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$4.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$31MCommunity Improvement$75kCivil Rights$25kRecreation & Sports$25kCrime & Legal$22kPublic Benefit$20k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $107k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.8M
$18,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY$4,826,000
STRATEGIC ADVISERS DIGITAL MEDIA LLC$25,000
MRG ACQUISITION LLC$25,000
NEW YORK STATE RAD SOCIETY$18,000
PREVENT CANCER FOUNDATION$17,000
WISCONSIN RADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY$12,250
TIGHT LINES CONSULTANCY LLC (JENEARY)$10,000
DAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COUNTERPOINT MESSAGING LLC: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
NV
IA
PA
NJ
KY
VA
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31M · 13 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$31M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

77%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $29M · revenue +29%
  • TA
    THE ACADEMY FOR RADIOLOGY & BIOMEDICAL IMAGING RESEARCH
    4× · 2017–2020 · $496k · revenue +7%
  • PC
    Prevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn
    7× · 2017–2025 · $172k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CW
    CONGRESSIONAL WOMENS SOFTBALL GAME INC
    one grant, 2024 · $44k · revenue 0%
  • MR
    Maryland Radiological Society Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -42%
  • PR
    PENNSYLVANIA RADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…

Community Improvement
2
American Roentgen Ray Society

The mission of the society is to advance medicine through the science of radiology and its allied sciences by enabling the creation and exchange of knowledge and information in the field through its journal, meetings and other means.

Health
3
Texas Radiological Society a Chapter

The mission of the texas radiological society, as a chapter of the american college of radiology, is to serve, promote and advance the profession of radiology in texas.

—
4
American Society for Radiation Oncology

To advance the practice of radiation oncology by promoting excellence in patient care, providing opportunities for educational and professional develpoment, promoting research and disseminating research results and representing radiation…

—
5
American Society of Spine Radiology

To advance the knowledge and development of spine radiology.

Health
6
The Radiosurgery Society

The Radiosurgery Society is a multi-disciplinary non-profit organization, consisting of surgeons, radiation oncologists, physicists, and allied health professionals, who are dedicated to advancing the science and clinical practice of SRS,…

Community Improvement
7
Association of University Radiologists

To promote research, education, and scholarship in academic radiology.

—
8
Association of Program Directors in Radiology

The pupose of the organization is to the advance the art & science of radilogy by the development, assessment, & supervision of postgraduate medical education, teaching and research.

Health
9
Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) is a professional medical organization dedicated to furthering the advancement of the science, practice, and continued education of the specialty of ultrasound radiology.

—
10
Radiological Society of North America Inc

The society is organized for scientific, educational, and charitable purposes. rsna promotes excellence in patient care and health care delivery through education, research and technological innovation.

Health
11
International Society of Radiology

The principal function of the society is to support education efforts for radiologists, physicists, technologists, and other radiation workers. The society is also concerned with radiation protection of patients and workers and with…

—
12
American College of Radiology Foundation

The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for Women's Health Research; the most unlike its peers is Congressional Womens Softball Game Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY: $28,701,000 · HealthAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY+5 more: $251,000 · HealthPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC: $900,000 · OtherTHE ACADEMY FOR RADIOLOGY & BIOMEDICAL IMAGING RESEARCH: $495,599 · OtherTHE NEW YORK STATE RADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $57,500 · Other+11 more: $246,500 · OtherCONGRESSIONAL WOMENS SOFTBALL GAME INC: $44,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAID HEALTH PLANS OF AMERICA: $22,500 · Community Improvement
Health$28,952,000Other$1,699,599Human Services$44,000Community Improvement$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY: $28,701,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC: $900,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetTHE ACADEMY FOR RADIOLOGY & BIOMEDICAL IMAGING RESEARCH: $495,599 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetPrevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn: $172,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetTHE NEW YORK STATE RADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $57,500 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL WOMENS SOFTBALL GAME INC: $44,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetDAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP: $42,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetWISCONSIN RADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $30,250 over 2y, 17% of budgetMEDICAID HEALTH PLANS OF AMERICA: $22,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMICHIGAN RADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $22,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetMaryland Radiological Society Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA RADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $18,750 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetRADIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American College of Radiology Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American College of Radiology Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American College of Radiology Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home