Skip to content
American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Inc at a glance

· Public charity

American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Inc

The principal function of the college is to further research and education in neuropsychopharmacology and related fields by: a) promoting the interaction of a broad range of scientific disciplines of brain and behavior in order to advance the understanding of causes prevention and treatment of diseases of the nervous system including…

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$439kScience & Tech$50kEnvironment$45kHuman Services$45k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $95,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $168,696 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $73,696 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$12,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN BRAIN COALITION$30,000
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION$20,000
ONE TREE PLANTED INC$12,500
CHARITY WATER$12,500
National Academy of Sciences$10,000
AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN BRAIN COALITION: $30k → 11%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%AMERICAN BRAIN COALITION: $26k → 11%YALE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE: $35k → 12%AMERICAN SOC OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY INC: $20k → 4%AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%ONE TREE PLANTED INC: $20k → 10%AMERICAN BRAIN COALITION: $25k → 11%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%American Soc of Clinical Psychopharmacology Inc: $20k → 4%AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%ONE TREE PLANTED INC: $13k → 10%AMERICAN BRAIN COALITION: $20k → 11%AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 7%ONE TREE PLANTED INC: $13k → 10%AMERICAN BRAIN COALITION: $15k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $6k → 14%AMERICAN BRAIN COALITION: $15k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $6k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $6k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $6k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $6k → 14%AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS: $13k → 14%AMERICANS FOR MEDIAL PROGRESS: $10k → 14%AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS: $10k → 14%AMERICANS FOR MEDIAL PROGRESS: $10k → 14%AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS: $10k → 14%AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS: $10k → 14%AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS: $10k → 14%AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS: $10k → 14%National Academy of Sciences: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
NY
CT
VA
MD
TN
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $70k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$35k · 50% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Research support

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$35k · 50% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Research Support

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$494k · 7 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$494k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    American Brain Coalition
    6× · 2019–2025 · $131k · revenue +80%
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $83k · revenue +30%
  • CHARITY GLOBAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
American Physiological Society

Empowering scientists to understand life and improve health by advancing and communicating discoveries in physiology and medicine.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The American Neurological Association

Advancing science, education, and careers to improve neurologic health for all.

Health
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
American Psychological Association

American psychological association is a national membership organization created to promote the advancement, communication, and application of psychological science and knowledge to benefit society and improve lives. apa fulfills these…

Social Science
8
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.

Health
9
American Anthropological Association

To advance anthropology as the science that studies humankind in all its aspects, through archeological, biological, ethnological, and linguistic research; and to further the professional interest of american anthropologist, including the…

Social Science
10
The American Society of Biomechanics

The dissemination of information concerning the science of biomechanics to the medical and scientific communities through the publication of newsletters and annual and mid-year meetings.

—
11
American Institute of Physics Inc

Aip advances the physical sciences as a federation and an institute. as a federation, aip works to advance the success of its member societies and affiliates so that they can leverage their diverse expertise and contributions in advancing…

Science & Tech
12
American College of Veterinary Pathologists Inc

The mission of the american college of veterinary pathologists is to promote excellence in veterinary pathology through our members as they protect and improve animal, human, and environmental health to benefit society.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Americans for Medical Progress Educational Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Brain Coalition: $130,500 · HealthAmerican Brain CoalitionFOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $30,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEA…AMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $83,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PR…American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology Inc: $40,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Society of Clin…AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $120,000 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC AS…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $40,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES O…Yale University: $35,000 · EducationYale Universit…CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $45,317 · Human ServicesONE TREE PLANTED INC: $45,317 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10,000 · Science & Tech
Health$160,500Arts & Culture$123,000Community Improvement$120,000Education$75,000Human Services$45,317Philanthropy$45,317Science & Tech$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Brain Coalition: $130,500 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetAMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $83,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $45,317 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $45,317 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetYale University: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $30,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Inc?

Find your warmest path to American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American College of Neuropsychopharmacology’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home