Skip to content
American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine

To further the educational and scientific progress in the specialty of laboratory animal medicine and to encourage education, training, research, and establish certification standards in the field of laboratory animal medicine.

$217k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$632kHealth$432kEducation$131kAnimals$27k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $181,256, the rows itemized in this filing. The $216,596 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,340 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$46,944
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLIN$49,071
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$47,407
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$46,944
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$21,901
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY$15,933
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECH: $29k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $30k → 16%THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $22k → 17%TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $28k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $30k → 17%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $30k → 22%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLIN: $49k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $10k → 14%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $29k → 14%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVSERSITY: $49k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $47k → 13%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $28k → 15%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $29k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $27k → 12%INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICI: $40k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $30k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $22k → 14%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $41k → 23%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $30k → 19%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECH: $28k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $29k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $29k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $30k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $7k → 14%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVSERSITY: $21k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $27k → 13%INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICI: $18k → 16%FRED HUTCHINSON: $29k → 9%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 8%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $29k → 23%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECH: $23k → 8%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $14k → 14%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 23%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECH: $23k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MD
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $26k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$26k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 6 repeat orgs$603k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
19

Total granted

$429k
$532k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    4× · 2019–2024 · $156k · revenue +82%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    3× · 2018–2023 · $96k · revenue +57%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $17k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • OH
    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $49k
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +44%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rockefeller University; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $73,957 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINAIndiana University School of Medicine: $57,593 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLIN: $49,071 · OtherMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $48,750 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVISTexas A&M University-Commerce: $30,000 · OtherTexas A&M University-CommerceCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $29,830 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $29,493 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $29,483 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $29,001 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $27,327 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $27,217 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $25,121 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVSERSITY: $20,577 · OtherMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $102,661 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $96,387 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONA…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $58,386 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFOR…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $30,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE …JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $29,800 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $29,718 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONEmory University: $28,752 · EducationEmory UniversityWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $27,854 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITYThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $22,956 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $21,904 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $21,901 · EducationMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $156,476 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KET…TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $27,653 · HealthTEXAS BIOMEDICAL R…FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $17,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR BIO…NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $14,000 · Science & Tech
Other$537,420Education$470,319Health$201,129Science & Tech$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $156,476 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $102,661 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $96,387 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $58,386 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $29,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $29,718 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $29,493 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $28,752 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $27,854 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $27,653 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $22,956 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $21,904 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $21,901 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $17,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine?

Find your warmest path to American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home