· Public charity
American College of Cardiology
To transform cardiovascular care and improve heart health.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $141,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $219,741 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $78,341 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $133k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research | $20,000 |
| John Hopkins University | $20,000 |
| Kansas Chapter of the ACC | $15,000 |
| Yale University | $15,000 |
| New Jersey Chapter of the ACC | $12,000 |
| Massachusetts Chapter of ACC | $11,400 |
| Washington Chapter of the ACC | $10,000 |
| Rhode Island Chapter of the ACC | $10,000 |
| Nebraska Chapter of the ACC | $10,000 |
| Alaska Chapter of ACC | $10,000 |
| University of New Mexico | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMARYLAND CHAPTER ACC INC3× · 2019–2022 · $55k · revenue +60%
- ACARIZONA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY3× · 2019–2023 · $41k · revenue +41%
- NCNORTH CAROLINA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY2× · 2022–2023 · $34k · revenue +216%
Funded once
- TCTEXAS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGYone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +9%
- MCMICHIGAN CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +102%
- MCMISSOURI CHAPTER OF AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGYone grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Continuing medical education, lectures, seminars, etc. for new york state cardiologists.
To transform cardiovascular care and improve heart health.
Provide a central forum for physicians and scientists of indian origin in the u.s.a. who have interest in cardiovascular diseases.
The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…
The organization provided educational meetings and publications for georgia cardiologists.
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
To build a cohesive Cardiovascular community throughout the State of Oregon, in order to locally promote education, research, use of guidelines and influence health care policy.
To enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine
Promote quality health care for all texans by strenghtening the practice of internal medicine.
To transform cardiovascular care and improve heart health of all hoosiers.
The mission of the american college of veterinary internal medicine (acvim) is to enhance animal and human health by advancing veterinary internal medicine through training, education, an discovery. the acvim is the american certifying…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Chapter of the American Co and the most unlike its peers is Americares Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARYLAND CHAPTER ACC INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA CHAPTER AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN CO ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATE CHAPTER AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER AMERICAN COLLEGE O ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CHAPTER OF AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI CHAPTER OF AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY CHAPTER AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NEW ENGLND TRI-STATE CHAPTER OF ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA CHAPTER AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA CHAPTER AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CAR ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY - WEST VIRGINIA AFFILIATE INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American College of Cardiology funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.